Technical Discussion Topics related to Technical Issues

SHOCKing discussion!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 22, 2007 | 05:09 PM
  #1  
Slim's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Back Marker
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 203
From: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Slim is on a distinguished road
SHOCKing discussion!

AH! Now that I have your attention ..... if you're suspension literate ..... right this way .....

So in the past dozen years of my "mechanical life" I have come to know that shocks with a remote compression canister posess greater "anti-foaming" possibility and "heat soak" opportunity. What about the shock of our beloved Firestorm? Uhhh, I mean Superhawk?

Oh, allow me to interrupt with good news that I have finally replaced the stock shock on my CBR600F2 with one from
a CBR600F3 (which has this really cool remote compression canister on it!). There's snow outside, so no ride yet .....

So, yeah, now if you're thinking "this guy is nuts if he's thinking of what I think he's think of" then ..... what'd'ya think?

I can procure another stock Superhawk shock (because I sure ain't using my stocker ..... y'know, just in case) and another F3
shock ..... or an F4/i or a 1000RR. Whatever! Then I can disassemble both, drill and tap the stocker, fit the remote on,
re-valve and then have it charged back up again.

Right?

RIGHT?!?!?!??!??!??!

Discuss ..... please.

PATIA.

(oh, btw, I bought icebud's Wilbers, so I don't NEED to do this experiment ..... but I WANT to and for other reasons as well)
Old Nov 22, 2007 | 05:31 PM
  #2  
Scumbag's Avatar
Senior Member
Superstock
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 379
From: Seattle, WA
Scumbag is an unknown quantity at this point
It may be the turkey and beer but you have my attention...
Old Nov 22, 2007 | 06:08 PM
  #3  
drew_c14's Avatar
Senior Member
SuperBike
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,455
From: Williamsburg, VA
drew_c14 is on a distinguished road
Probably wouldn't be terribly hard. But by the time you buy a remote canister, lines, fittings, and re-gut the stock valves then you might as well have just bought a new one.
Old Nov 22, 2007 | 07:30 PM
  #4  
superbling's Avatar
Moderator
MotoGP
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,553
From: South Texas
superbling is on a distinguished road
CBR series shocks are extremely short compared to the VTR body which, unfortunately, is one of the longest around. More bad news, the cbr's also have a much lighter spring.

Experimenting with used shocks, I tried an R1, R6, ducati 916, fox CBR900 unit with heavier spring, penske cbr954 with heavier spring, and a ohlins vtr unit in need of a rebuild.

Even worn out, the ohlins was, hands down, the best. Pony up and get the real deal or at least get anything else sprung/valved for the VTR.

Here's a pic of superbling with the R1/aftermarket spring. It sure LOOKED great:

Name:  leftrearlow.jpg
Views: 53
Size:  163.2 KB

and with the penske:

Name:  KG9K5007.jpg
Views: 58
Size:  66.0 KB
Old Nov 22, 2007 | 07:39 PM
  #5  
Slim's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Back Marker
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 203
From: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Slim is on a distinguished road
Originally Posted by superbling
CBR series shocks are extremely short compared to the VTR body which, unfortunately, is one of the longest around. More bad news, the cbr's also have a much lighter spring.

Experimenting with used shocks, I tried an R1, R6, ducati 916, fox CBR900 unit with heavier spring, penske cbr954 with heavier spring, and a ohlins vtr unit in need of a rebuild.

Even worn out, the ohlins was, hands down, the best. Pony up and get the real deal or at least get anything else sprung/valved for the VTR.

Here's a pic of superbling with the R1/aftermarket spring. It sure LOOKED great:



and with the penske:
Not sure i'm following you. I'm not talking about just swapping in an entire shock, just the remote part. I'm not sure what the overall shock length would have to do with it (unless you're talking about potential issues with the change in oil volumes and valving?).

I don't care about looks. (but your's sure is worth looking at - but you already know that )
Old Nov 22, 2007 | 07:42 PM
  #6  
Slim's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Back Marker
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 203
From: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Slim is on a distinguished road
Originally Posted by drew_c14
Probably wouldn't be terribly hard. But by the time you buy a remote canister, lines, fittings, and re-gut the stock valves then you might as well have just bought a new one.
I don't see it. It would not cost me $600, 700 or 800 to do this swap. The shocks can be bought on E-Bay for $100 for the pair. If a complete shock rebuild can be done at a shock shop for $75 (which i'm sure is nothing more than replacing the fluid and re-charging nitrogen) then I don't see the money side of it. I can drill and tap the hole myself.

Maybe you know different? My ears are open.
Old Nov 22, 2007 | 09:10 PM
  #7  
Yardstick's Avatar
Senior Member
Back Marker
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 176
From: Chandler, AZ
Yardstick
I can't imagine just the remote reservoir making much difference on the road unless you're riding the bike over some really rough roads or pushing it extremely hard for extended periods of time. Revalving the stock shock would probably suit most people's needs.

As an experiment for the heck of it... I'd say it's probably do-able. I'm not sure of the configuration of the shock you're looking at adapting the reservoir from, but you'd probably have an easier time with one where the remote reservoir is connected by a hydraulic hose rather than somehow directly attached to the shock body.
Old Nov 22, 2007 | 09:42 PM
  #8  
Hawkrider's Avatar
Administrator
World Champion
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 105,287
From: Fulton, MO
Hawkrider will become famous soon enoughHawkrider will become famous soon enough
Adding a remote res isn't going to make the stocker any better. The valving is still way off for anything remotely resembling sport riding. Around town its fine but pick up the pace and it quickly shows its flaws - wrong spring, insufficient rebound, too much HSC, and damping that changes too much with shock temperature.

Get the real deal. I second what 'Bling states above.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jscobey
General Discussion
2
Jul 29, 2013 10:24 PM
smokinjoe73
General Discussion
4
Jun 26, 2011 08:17 AM
Cafe Racer
Knowledge Base
8
May 20, 2011 02:37 PM
uchi
Modifications - Performance
9
Feb 7, 2010 01:19 PM
Random
General Discussion
4
Aug 31, 2006 01:50 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:29 AM.


Top

© 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands



When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.