Technical Discussion Topics related to Technical Issues

K&N without rejetting???

Old Apr 16, 2008 | 02:21 PM
  #1  
Shawker03's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Squid
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 6
Shawker03 is on a distinguished road
K&N without rejetting???

I've got an '03 Hawk with Jardine RT-1's and I need to replace my stock airfilter... If I get a non-stock air filter (K&N, BMC...) will I need to rejet the carbs? I've noticed that most people who have an aftermarket exhaust and airfilter also have rejeted the carbs. Any one who has had sucess without rejetting?
Old Apr 16, 2008 | 02:30 PM
  #2  
lazn's Avatar
Senior Member
MotoGP
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,132
From: Phoenix, AZ
lazn is on a distinguished road
My understanding is that jetting is suggested for exhaust mods and required for aftermarket filters. So you would have to rejet if that is true. But my bike is stock so I have no personal experience in this.
Old Apr 16, 2008 | 03:36 PM
  #3  
Micah's Avatar
Junior Member
Squid
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 19
Micah is on a distinguished road
I have 2 Bros exhaust and a K&N filter and it ran horrible til I jetted it. There is just too much air flow for the carbs to keep up.
Old Apr 16, 2008 | 06:07 PM
  #4  
Laynout's Avatar
Member
Squid
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 36
From: Cumming, GA
Laynout is on a distinguished road
Rejet?

I just had this same conversation w/my Honda service tech. He said to install the Jardines and go ride and see if everything runs OK. Normally, slip-ons are just that. Slip-on and go! However, the air box is a whole different animal. A switch to a K&N/BMC filter will definitley need to be rejetted and in his words not mine, you may actually get little if any improvement. And then he reminded me that there are a whole bunch of highly-paid engineers sitting in Japan designing this stuff to work just right.
Old Apr 16, 2008 | 06:11 PM
  #5  
cliby's Avatar
Senior Member
SuperBike
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,548
From: MN
cliby is on a distinguished road
K&N = lots of work + no gain

sounds like a good idea to me. a search will yield a lot of experience on this exercise
Old Apr 16, 2008 | 06:18 PM
  #6  
Hawkrider's Avatar
Administrator
World Champion
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 105,287
From: Fulton, MO
Hawkrider will become famous soon enoughHawkrider will become famous soon enough
It's a good idea to do if you're going to rejet anyway. You still have to go through the tuning process, right? With that said, you're looking at another 1-2hp, maybe three from the filter. Between pipes, filter, jetting, and maybe an advancer you should get about 8-10 hp more, depending on how well you (or your shop) tunes it.
Old Apr 16, 2008 | 06:32 PM
  #7  
Shawker03's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Squid
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 6
Shawker03 is on a distinguished road
Thank you all for your input. This has confirmed my suspisions-that if I try a K&N I'll likely have to rejet. I was going through the 24k maint and need to replace the airfilter anyway, wasn't sure I wanted to cough up $50+ for a stock airfilter when a K&N is a little less than twice that...I really don't want to rejet and retune yet and the bike really does run well as it is-not to mention that it sounds great too. Thank you all!
Old Apr 17, 2008 | 07:45 AM
  #8  
RickB's Avatar
Senior Member
SuperBike
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,572
From: Buffalo, NY
RickB is on a distinguished road
I am running a k&n with only the carb needle shim mod and the bike runs great... I still have the stock exhaust on it though...




Originally Posted by Shawker03
Thank you all for your input. This has confirmed my suspisions-that if I try a K&N I'll likely have to rejet. I was going through the 24k maint and need to replace the airfilter anyway, wasn't sure I wanted to cough up $50+ for a stock airfilter when a K&N is a little less than twice that...I really don't want to rejet and retune yet and the bike really does run well as it is-not to mention that it sounds great too. Thank you all!
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
uni_boy15
Technical Discussion
3
May 25, 2009 01:42 PM
reaper
Modifications - Performance
10
Oct 26, 2007 05:25 AM
azhawk1
Technical Discussion
3
Aug 2, 2007 03:04 PM
collectiv
Modifications - Performance
8
Mar 28, 2006 05:01 PM
extrmski
Modifications - Performance
5
Jan 16, 2005 07:40 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:05 AM.