Is this a viable touring bike?
Is this a viable touring bike?
Hello everyone, first post here. Bear with me if you will because I'm in a pickle:
My only bike right now is an '05 1000RR. It's great and I love it, but it seems that more and more of my riding is shifting to longer, 2-up trips (the girlfriend would rather ride with me than sit there while I do a track day...). I'm in western Washington and there is some really good riding nearby, but most of it takes at least a couple of hours' ride time just to get to it.
So the conundrum is that it seems like I have two choices: A big, 600 lb. bike that can comfortably get myself and passenger to the twisties and then bore me to sleep once I get there, or a razor sharp bike that would be heaven in the mountains, but impossible to ride TO the mountains.
I did the North Cascades Loop last summer over two days and by the time we got back, the pain was so bad that I have not been able to talk her back onto the bike since. We actually stopped at the Safeway in Chelan and MacGyvered-up some "gel pads" out of bags of marshmallows and a roll of packing tape (worked surprisingly well for about a half hour so don't laugh!).
Recently I was at a used bike dealership and sat on a '98 'Hawk. I was surprised to find that it felt even lighter than my CBR! And the seat pad was way thicker and softer, of course, than I'm used to. Plus the bike seems so narrow and flickable that I can't see why it wouldn't be a blast in the twisty stuff.
Yet I get on here and see people complain about the discomfort and say that 2-up riding is a no no.
So:
Can I bolt on enough parts to make a Superhawk a decent sport tourer? For, say, 300-400 mile days? And if so, will these parts basically ruin the sporting nature of the bike or can you still have fun on it?
Is there a good passenger seat? I notice that there's a Corbin with a passenger backrest. People on this board trash it, and the Corbin seat I bought for my CBR (before I decided that another bike altogether might just be a better solution) is a piece of crap that I had to mangle with a hammer to get the mounts to line up. Build quality aside, is the Corbin Gunfighter and Lady seat for the Superhawk a decent solution for long range passenger comfort (what with the backrest and all)? Does anyone have one of these seats and carry a passenger often that can give a review?
If it just can't be made a good tourer, does anyone else have a recommendation on a bike that will do everything? My friend has an FZ-1 and he and his wife had no problems on that same trip that left my girlfriend and I crippled. And he seems to be able to carve a corner pretty well on it. The thing's just so heavy though! (It doesn't help that I'm a terrible motorcycling combination of short, skinny, and clumsy. Even at just over 400 lbs., I've accidentally dropped my pretty Respol CBR on its side at least three times, so bikes that weigh four times as much as I do just aren't that appealing...)
Anyway, thanks for reading and weighing in. The problem with buying a motorcycle is there's just no way to ride it how you would want to before you buy. It's not like you can take it on an 800 mile 2-up test ride. Hence it seems I always regret the bikes I buy.
So should I join the Superhawk community or what?
My only bike right now is an '05 1000RR. It's great and I love it, but it seems that more and more of my riding is shifting to longer, 2-up trips (the girlfriend would rather ride with me than sit there while I do a track day...). I'm in western Washington and there is some really good riding nearby, but most of it takes at least a couple of hours' ride time just to get to it.
So the conundrum is that it seems like I have two choices: A big, 600 lb. bike that can comfortably get myself and passenger to the twisties and then bore me to sleep once I get there, or a razor sharp bike that would be heaven in the mountains, but impossible to ride TO the mountains.
I did the North Cascades Loop last summer over two days and by the time we got back, the pain was so bad that I have not been able to talk her back onto the bike since. We actually stopped at the Safeway in Chelan and MacGyvered-up some "gel pads" out of bags of marshmallows and a roll of packing tape (worked surprisingly well for about a half hour so don't laugh!).
Recently I was at a used bike dealership and sat on a '98 'Hawk. I was surprised to find that it felt even lighter than my CBR! And the seat pad was way thicker and softer, of course, than I'm used to. Plus the bike seems so narrow and flickable that I can't see why it wouldn't be a blast in the twisty stuff.
Yet I get on here and see people complain about the discomfort and say that 2-up riding is a no no.
So:
Can I bolt on enough parts to make a Superhawk a decent sport tourer? For, say, 300-400 mile days? And if so, will these parts basically ruin the sporting nature of the bike or can you still have fun on it?
Is there a good passenger seat? I notice that there's a Corbin with a passenger backrest. People on this board trash it, and the Corbin seat I bought for my CBR (before I decided that another bike altogether might just be a better solution) is a piece of crap that I had to mangle with a hammer to get the mounts to line up. Build quality aside, is the Corbin Gunfighter and Lady seat for the Superhawk a decent solution for long range passenger comfort (what with the backrest and all)? Does anyone have one of these seats and carry a passenger often that can give a review?
If it just can't be made a good tourer, does anyone else have a recommendation on a bike that will do everything? My friend has an FZ-1 and he and his wife had no problems on that same trip that left my girlfriend and I crippled. And he seems to be able to carve a corner pretty well on it. The thing's just so heavy though! (It doesn't help that I'm a terrible motorcycling combination of short, skinny, and clumsy. Even at just over 400 lbs., I've accidentally dropped my pretty Respol CBR on its side at least three times, so bikes that weigh four times as much as I do just aren't that appealing...)
Anyway, thanks for reading and weighing in. The problem with buying a motorcycle is there's just no way to ride it how you would want to before you buy. It's not like you can take it on an 800 mile 2-up test ride. Hence it seems I always regret the bikes I buy.
So should I join the Superhawk community or what?
I love my hawk, and I use it as a sport tourer more than anything else. I live in oklahoma it is flat and the roads are all straight. I have helibars, the corbin seat and a zero gravity touring screen. The most miles that I have done in a single day is right about 650, that is single. two up around 200ish with no real complaints. I would recommend some type of throttle lock to give your hand a rest when needed, and if your going to ride two up much at all i would spend the money on a good rider pillion com system. that way it makes the miles go by for her faster.
Well, I'd love to say "YES", but I'll stick with a more somber, yeah, it can do that...
It is lighter and more flickable then the CBR at road speeds, a lot more nimble... It's a curbe carver of great renown...
It's also lot more forgiving than a CBR if you aren't running at a GP riders pace... Altough it doesn't have the insane tops speed of the CBR...
The seat is better by far than the CBR for the rider as stock (even better with a Sargent) unfortunately the pillion seat isn't very good as stock, and even a Corbin/Sargent pillion seat isn't that much better... Mainly based on the cramped angle of the legs and other things it's not that comfortable back there unless your girfriend is very short and petite... A lot better than the CBR by far thoo...
Weather the Corbin "Gunfighter & Lady" is any good... dunno... never tried it... Did try another Corbin seat and sold it after 2 weeks since I couldn't get it mounted right (I didn't use a hammer, so that might have been the problem...) But I imagine that a more cushioned pillion won't make things worse... The backrest looks a bit flimsy though and it's definetly a "false safety" in regards to it holding anybody's weight, should theoreticly improve comfort though...
Basicly, for you, miles of improvement, for the Gf... definetly better, but might not be good enough for the miles you are talking about... Also for you it's a lot easier to buy comfort parts (adjustable clipons being one...)
Oh... and bolting on stuff?? No need to, other than clipons, seat and with short legs possibly adjustable rearsets you won't need anything else, and it won't ruin the bike in any way... just make it better...
It is lighter and more flickable then the CBR at road speeds, a lot more nimble... It's a curbe carver of great renown...
The seat is better by far than the CBR for the rider as stock (even better with a Sargent) unfortunately the pillion seat isn't very good as stock, and even a Corbin/Sargent pillion seat isn't that much better... Mainly based on the cramped angle of the legs and other things it's not that comfortable back there unless your girfriend is very short and petite... A lot better than the CBR by far thoo...
Weather the Corbin "Gunfighter & Lady" is any good... dunno... never tried it... Did try another Corbin seat and sold it after 2 weeks since I couldn't get it mounted right (I didn't use a hammer, so that might have been the problem...) But I imagine that a more cushioned pillion won't make things worse... The backrest looks a bit flimsy though and it's definetly a "false safety" in regards to it holding anybody's weight, should theoreticly improve comfort though...
Basicly, for you, miles of improvement, for the Gf... definetly better, but might not be good enough for the miles you are talking about... Also for you it's a lot easier to buy comfort parts (adjustable clipons being one...)
Oh... and bolting on stuff?? No need to, other than clipons, seat and with short legs possibly adjustable rearsets you won't need anything else, and it won't ruin the bike in any way... just make it better...
Last edited by Tweety; Feb 11, 2008 at 05:24 AM.
Oh... btw if the VTR isn't enough of a tourer, might consider the VFR... it's a great 2-up bike, and it eats corners... not a much grunt as the VTR (which to be fair is a hoolingan bike...), but when I get of to adjust various body parts and fill up the tank the VFR riders take another 4-5 runs through the twisties, still smiling and with their respective comfortable in the back... (and still on their first tank...)
I'd have to vote for the VFR as well. Its a much better bike for 2 up sport touring. As for cornering, well its a VFR that Freddie Spencer uses for taking passengers around the track on at speed. We took a cross-country trip this past summer, FL to CA and back, 7000 miles in 18 days (with 3 days off in Monterey CA for the MotoGP and AMA races), and my wife did it on her VFR, no problem. Longest day was 725 miles. The bike is comfortable, fast and stone cold reliable. There are guys out there with over 100k on their Viffers. If you are interested in the VFR solution, talk to the guys and gals on the VFR board at vfrdiscussion.com You can contact my wife there as well (VFRTiger) and talk to her about touring on it. Just be prepared to get your ear chatted off about the VFR, as she is a serious fan of the bike!
Her VFR:
It sounds to me like you need to buy a bike for your wife. A friend of mine bought his wife-to-be a CBR600F4i with a slip-on exhaust. She liked bikes before and she LOVES her CBR. He bought it with some mild cosmetic damage, fixed it and put a Tapeworks kit on it and it's a sweet little ride. She rides it to Laguna and takes mutli day-tours with the boys and girls. The VTR is a great bike and reasonably comfortable. I rode mine all day (6-10 hours) many times. But I wouldn't ride two up on it further than across town.
The fuel mileage could be one of the only drawbacks... I just got mine, so haven't put it to the test, but i think 100-125 miles on a tank is about all these things get...
somebody correct me if i'm wrong....
which means more gas stops.... My last bike got somewhere in the 180ish range if i remember right... so its not a huge differance, but does many lots of gas stops on the way to the riding spots
somebody correct me if i'm wrong....
which means more gas stops.... My last bike got somewhere in the 180ish range if i remember right... so its not a huge differance, but does many lots of gas stops on the way to the riding spots
I only get 44 mpg. A Honda Interceptor might be a better choice. After about 2 hours of riding, I start to get a bit stiff, but maybe because I'm old! Most I've ridden is 11 hours on the SHawk and felt a bit beat-up. Luckily, you have to refuel every 150 miles or so (though for some reason some people on this forum only get 90 miles?) This is about 1.5 hours of riding and gives you time to refuel and stretch.
Still, the SHawk is far more comfortable than the 1000RR in almost every way and you don't get that annoying exhaust smell all over you from the rear pipes placement so common with underseat setups.
Get an Interceptor ABS.
Still, the SHawk is far more comfortable than the 1000RR in almost every way and you don't get that annoying exhaust smell all over you from the rear pipes placement so common with underseat setups.
Get an Interceptor ABS.
Thanks for the replies Guys and Gals, I appreciate the input.
I did think about a VFR, but have a few fundamental problems with them:
1.) I think they're hideous (no offense to VFR owners, just my opinion).
2.) 560 pounds!!!!
3.) They cost roughly twice the amount as a VTR of the same year.
The ugliness doesn't bother me that much. Give me a bike with camouflage faux fur all over it and I'll ride the wheels off of it if it does what I need it to. It's not like you get to see it when you're on it, anyway. And a pretty bike just makes it hurt more when you're loading it into your van and drop it
Which brings me to the more important drawback of weight. I wish it didn't take a 560 lb. bike to enjoy a day's ride. It's not like I'm a complete weakling or anything, but I am seriously indescribably clumsy...
I'll still keep the VFR in mind, though. Maybe I'll just have to resign myself to the fact that it's going to take a big, heavy bike to enjoy touring.
In which case, does anyone have any experience with Triumph Sprint STs? If I'm going to be spending VFR money on a touring bike, they're about in the same price range.
Oh also, I'm really mostly only concerned with passenger comfort. As much as people don't believe me when I say it, I'm MORE comfortable in a sporting posture. My CBR is the most comfortable bike I've ever ridden and would have no problem going 500 miles a day on it. It's only when I've got a passenger that it's a problem. Both for her and I.
Oh yeah, and I DID try buying her a bike. Went all out, too. Brand new, purdy bike. It freaked her the hell out and she decided riding isn't for her. Too scary, I guess. So she'll stick to the back seat. I guess it's just not for everyone.
I did think about a VFR, but have a few fundamental problems with them:
1.) I think they're hideous (no offense to VFR owners, just my opinion).
2.) 560 pounds!!!!
3.) They cost roughly twice the amount as a VTR of the same year.
The ugliness doesn't bother me that much. Give me a bike with camouflage faux fur all over it and I'll ride the wheels off of it if it does what I need it to. It's not like you get to see it when you're on it, anyway. And a pretty bike just makes it hurt more when you're loading it into your van and drop it
Which brings me to the more important drawback of weight. I wish it didn't take a 560 lb. bike to enjoy a day's ride. It's not like I'm a complete weakling or anything, but I am seriously indescribably clumsy...
I'll still keep the VFR in mind, though. Maybe I'll just have to resign myself to the fact that it's going to take a big, heavy bike to enjoy touring.
In which case, does anyone have any experience with Triumph Sprint STs? If I'm going to be spending VFR money on a touring bike, they're about in the same price range.
Oh also, I'm really mostly only concerned with passenger comfort. As much as people don't believe me when I say it, I'm MORE comfortable in a sporting posture. My CBR is the most comfortable bike I've ever ridden and would have no problem going 500 miles a day on it. It's only when I've got a passenger that it's a problem. Both for her and I.
Oh yeah, and I DID try buying her a bike. Went all out, too. Brand new, purdy bike. It freaked her the hell out and she decided riding isn't for her. Too scary, I guess. So she'll stick to the back seat. I guess it's just not for everyone.
OK let me quantify a trifle - old VFR. I have a 97 and it's a blast. I'm shopping for a 98-01. The new ones are porkers. I have heard and talked with owners of the o3's with mod's that regain the performance of the earlier models. Good luck!
Older Interceptor is good. I found the Ninja 500R to be the most comfortable sportbike I've rode. 17 Hours longest time on that one. Cheap as dirt and looks pretty okay.
Be advised though that most Honda bikes are now balanced VERY well. A GoldWing actually does not feel the 8 trillion tons it weighs, AND it has reverse and is very reputable. I think you have to be over 40 to enjoy it though? ;p Stil, the VFR ABS is the way to go for you (used). Styling will grow on you after you buy it. If it doesn't, and you crash it, it can only look better. ;o
Be advised though that most Honda bikes are now balanced VERY well. A GoldWing actually does not feel the 8 trillion tons it weighs, AND it has reverse and is very reputable. I think you have to be over 40 to enjoy it though? ;p Stil, the VFR ABS is the way to go for you (used). Styling will grow on you after you buy it. If it doesn't, and you crash it, it can only look better. ;o
GeddyT! I have both the VTR and an '04 1000RR. I know your pain. My wife, however, does not. I bought her her own bike. Buuuut, back in the day before she rode she never had many problems on the back of the VTR with the Sargent seat. We did some pretty good touring back then, but we were also about 10 years younger! Ultimately I'm quicker in the twisties with the VTR. It just plain turns better - not necessarily "handles" better, because the RR is much more stable, but I can throw the VTR into a turn unlike any other. I can't get rid of the RR because it pulls like a friggin' freight train over 5k rpm, and that's addictive! If I could have both...oh wait, I do! If YOU can have both go for it!
Sell the 1000RR and get a Superhawk and a VFR. Hawks are so freakin cheap, but so much fun, I don't know why everyone does not have one. I too am considering a VFR as my trip bike as soon as I sell my cruiser. I used to want the nicest bike, but after having the SH, its not about being the best looking or the fastest, its all about the fun factor and improving my skills. And with 2 bikes, you have a good fun bike for shorter rides (VTR) and a nice comfy bike that is still a blast in the turns (VFR) and she is happy.
Does anybody know if a VFR wheelies like the VTR?
Does anybody know if a VFR wheelies like the VTR?
We've got both in the garage(see pic earlier this thread) (and just sold off another VFR last year). The answer is no to wheelies like a VTR. The VFR is a lot heavier than the VTR, and doesn't make as much low end torque. You can wheelie it, but you have to work at it. However, the VFR V-4 still has a decent amount of low end, so its fun to ride, you can do some decent cornes with it and its A LOT more comfortable for long trips. My wife rode hers FL-CA-FL this past year, 7000 miles in 15 days, and was comfortable the whole trip, including a couple of 700+ mile days.
Well I have ridden a VFR that wheelied... It made my VTR go hide in shame...
Altough id might have had a tad less than optimum fuel efficiency as the big Rotrex supercharger bolted to it was a bit thirsty....
If I add a VFR to the stable, I WILL add a supercharger to it...
Altough id might have had a tad less than optimum fuel efficiency as the big Rotrex supercharger bolted to it was a bit thirsty....
If I add a VFR to the stable, I WILL add a supercharger to it...
I made superbling in to a sport-tourer (larger tank, higher bars, lower pegs, bigger screen, better seat, etc):

that truly rivaled my VFR's but most folks would rather just opt and get the VFR instead.

that truly rivaled my VFR's but most folks would rather just opt and get the VFR instead.
I have an '85 VF1000R as well as my '98 Hawk and will ride either one of them from here to BFE. Age plays no part.....I'm 42 and will ride anywhere......Advil is a wonderful thing!! I do prefer the 1000R on longer trips due to fewer gas stops though. I can do about 250-285 miles on the 1000R vs. only 100 or so on the Hawk.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Dano
Classifieds
4
Feb 3, 2009 12:12 PM







