Valve Timing Question
05-30-2006, 09:49 AM
#2
Senior Member
Superstock
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 428
It depends if its advanced or retarded. It should run but not smoothy.
Do you know how to check if your cam chains are timed right? Pull the big allen bolt on the left side engine case and your vlave covers. The timing marks are on the cam sprockets and inside the allen hole. Good luck!
Do you know how to check if your cam chains are timed right? Pull the big allen bolt on the left side engine case and your vlave covers. The timing marks are on the cam sprockets and inside the allen hole. Good luck!
05-30-2006, 10:46 AM
#3
Member
Squid
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Calgary Alberta Canada
Posts: 76
Yes, I know how to, I have the service manual, but the marks on the cams do not line up perfectly on either cylinder if I put the crank to RT mark and FT marks, so I am concerned that maybe They would be off slightly. The bike starts great, and idles perfectly, revs right up to around 6000 rpm before I start to notice anything slightly wrong. Almost feels like it is starving fuel, but when I tested the petcock, the gas dumped out, so I know that is not the problem. I can get it to rev a little higher, but not very smoothly. I am not sure if it is valve timing, or electronic, or fuel. I just wanted to get some input as to what effect incorrect valve timing would have. I would rather not start playing with that, if I don't have to.
05-30-2006, 06:43 PM
#5
Member
Squid
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Calgary Alberta Canada
Posts: 76
I've got 50,000km on it, so I am pretty sure my chains are slightly stretched.. I talk to one bike mechanic about it, and he said that he rarely sees them line up perfectly. I know that I have not changed the timing on the rear cylinder because I learned from doing the front how not to let the chains jump when changing the CCTs. So I lined up the front cylinder at pretty much the exact same plave as the rear. both cams are slightly retarded. About a half tooth or so. Do you think I should try and move both of my cams so that they are both advanced a half tooth?
05-30-2006, 09:22 PM
#6
Senior Member
Superstock
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 428
Hmmm...
If you think the chains are stretched and thats why they won't line up I would replace the chains. The bike I timed had 28k miles so it had a few miles. The manual wasn't very straight forward so I had to mess around with it for while before I got the perfect lineup. Are the cam marks atleast lining up with the head? If so I would say stretched chain or keep messing around with it. If the cams won't time with the head I would say you have a badly stretched cam chain.
I can dig out my manual if you want.
If you think the chains are stretched and thats why they won't line up I would replace the chains. The bike I timed had 28k miles so it had a few miles. The manual wasn't very straight forward so I had to mess around with it for while before I got the perfect lineup. Are the cam marks atleast lining up with the head? If so I would say stretched chain or keep messing around with it. If the cams won't time with the head I would say you have a badly stretched cam chain.
I can dig out my manual if you want.
05-31-2006, 01:59 PM
#8
Member
Squid
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Calgary Alberta Canada
Posts: 76
Okay... So if I have both cams timed one tooth retarded, on both cylinders, would the bike still idle smooth, and perform not too badly at low RPMs? But then start to act like a poo face at higher RPMs??
05-31-2006, 07:15 PM
#10
Senior Member
Back Marker
Back Marker
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: East Tennessee
Posts: 208
Are both front and rear marks off by the same amount?
It would be relatively easy to reset the rear cyl one tooth and spin the crank a couple of times to see how close the timing marks look afterwards.
I'm not sure how many teeth on the cam gear ( about 44 ?) which would be about 8° per tooth .... or about 16° on the crank. Sure seems like more than enough to mess with performance in a big way.
It would be relatively easy to reset the rear cyl one tooth and spin the crank a couple of times to see how close the timing marks look afterwards.
I'm not sure how many teeth on the cam gear ( about 44 ?) which would be about 8° per tooth .... or about 16° on the crank. Sure seems like more than enough to mess with performance in a big way.
06-01-2006, 02:49 PM
#11
Member
Squid
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Calgary Alberta Canada
Posts: 76
See, I am not worried with moving the cams around and playing with it in that way, but if I can spin the crank, with no issues, or hitting, is it possible to smash a valve? I am pretty sure that both sets of cams are off the exact same ammount, so that is why I thought it was not set on the wrong teeth. I am also curious to know how hard it would be to change the cam chains? Do I have to pull the crank? Also, the marks on my crank, do I line it up with the letters, or the little line? I have been using the little line beside the FT, and RT marks. IS this correct?
06-01-2006, 03:26 PM
#12
Senior Member
Back Marker
Back Marker
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: East Tennessee
Posts: 208
Originally Posted by dustinwild
See, I am not worried with moving the cams around and playing with it in that way, but if I can spin the crank, with no issues, or hitting, is it possible to smash a valve? I am pretty sure that both sets of cams are off the exact same ammount, so that is why I thought it was not set on the wrong teeth. I am also curious to know how hard it would be to change the cam chains? Do I have to pull the crank? Also, the marks on my crank, do I line it up with the letters, or the little line? I have been using the little line beside the FT, and RT marks. IS this correct?
yes, the line next to FT and RT is the correct set point.
As far as changing the cam chains goes. I've not done it but I'd think it'd be just like installing a new drive chain.
ie: grind a link pin head, press out the pin and then wire the new chain to the end of the old, pull it through, press a new link into the new chain....
06-01-2006, 03:46 PM
#13
Senior Member
SuperBike
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: South Lake Tahoe, CA, USA
Posts: 1,689
the engine has quite a bit of valve-piston clearance, so one tooth probably woudn't be an issue.
replacement of the timing chains requires everything up to, but not including splitting the cases. i.e. removing clutch, primary drive gears, oil pump and water pump drives, flywheel, etc.
I woudl try to get the timing marks lined up first. If you are rotating the engine forward and the tensioners are in place they should line up.
replacement of the timing chains requires everything up to, but not including splitting the cases. i.e. removing clutch, primary drive gears, oil pump and water pump drives, flywheel, etc.
I woudl try to get the timing marks lined up first. If you are rotating the engine forward and the tensioners are in place they should line up.
06-16-2006, 05:03 PM
#14
Member
Squid
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Calgary Alberta Canada
Posts: 76
Well, I finally took my bike in to a mechanic and had him have a look at it.. He was shocked.. He heard me ride up on it, and he said, there is something wrong with it... So, I left it with him, and he tore into it to find out that the front Cylinder was out of timing one full rotation of the cams. But, the bike still started perfectly, idled great, had good low end torque... Now, I can't figure that one out. How does it run virtually perfect if the cams are out a full 360 degrees? Wow.. I was going to try and move the cams a tooth here, and a tooth there, but I didn't want to smash a valve again, so I took it in. I would have never guessed a full rotation out... Damn hard to read manual. I think I should go and buy one so that it is easier to read. Who would have guessed!!!
06-16-2006, 05:11 PM
#15
Administrator
World Champion
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Fulton, MO
Posts: 105,287
So I gotta ask...how does it run now?
Reason I ask is that one full rotation of the cams is the same thing as what you started with. One full rotation of the CRANK is different. That must be what he meant.
Reason I ask is that one full rotation of the cams is the same thing as what you started with. One full rotation of the CRANK is different. That must be what he meant.
06-16-2006, 06:48 PM
#17
Senior Member
Back Marker
Back Marker
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: East Tennessee
Posts: 208
Sounds fishy to me .. as Greg pointed out one rotation on the cam puts you back where you started.
One rotation off on the crank for the front cyl and I don't see the engine running at all, ie: intake down stroke pulls from the pipe.... the exhaust stroke goes back through the carb into the air box .....
One rotation off on the crank for the front cyl and I don't see the engine running at all, ie: intake down stroke pulls from the pipe.... the exhaust stroke goes back through the carb into the air box .....
06-16-2006, 07:36 PM
#18
Member
Squid
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Calgary Alberta Canada
Posts: 76
Well, I'm not sure... He said that the cams were out one full revolution. Basically so that it would spark one stroke off... Hmmm... I don't know.. It really doesn't make too much sense to me. I will have to get the bike back and figure it all out. I trust the mechanic though, he is a good friend of mine so I know that he wouldn't screw me over. It's not like I took it into a bike shop and trusted any of them crooks.. Heck, I used to work at a bike shop, I know what they do!! This guy is a machinist for his day job, and works on bike on the side. Used to be a tuner for a racing team here in the city. He makes custom machined cams, and machines heads, ports, and all that... He knows a ton about this kind of stuff. He tried to explain it to me over the phone, and I just couldn't quite follow it. I can't wait to get her back though!!! I miss her so! I have been bombing around on my brothers ZX9R for the last little while to tie me over... It's just not the same...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
