Technical Discussion Topics related to Technical Issues

Airbox resonance

Old Apr 16, 2009 | 10:31 AM
  #31  
mikstr's Avatar
Senior Member
MotoGP
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,631
From: Montreal
mikstr is on a distinguished road
MC, was the "Burnie Morgan" mod (http://www.burniemorgan.com/firestorm/airfilter.html) done on it or is it totally stock (as in with the filter lip intact and upper deflector still screwed into the cover)?

thanks again

Last edited by mikstr; Apr 16, 2009 at 11:32 AM.
Old Apr 16, 2009 | 11:35 AM
  #32  
FL02SupaHawk996's Avatar
Fastest Color
SuperBike
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,091
From: Lithia, FL
FL02SupaHawk996 is on a distinguished road
Cutting the top off the air box may not be necessary for the STG1 build, but I want to try it just to see if we can tune it. I'll have a full lid nearby in case it's needed cuz I don't want to cause my dyno guy to start drinking. At least not before 5pm

RCVTR, I'm using the K&N set up like stock, so no preceived torque hole (at least not from the butt dyno), but she studders more than usual at less than 4K RPMs, which I attribute to needing rejetted for the K&N on the slow side.

Also, I have no doubt once we cut the lid that we could end up with a run that looks like Rob described, but at least I can get dyno runs printed to put this one to rest...
Old Apr 16, 2009 | 11:37 AM
  #33  
FL02SupaHawk996's Avatar
Fastest Color
SuperBike
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,091
From: Lithia, FL
FL02SupaHawk996 is on a distinguished road
Originally Posted by mikstr
MC, was the "Burnie Morgan" mod (http://www.burniemorgan.com/firestorm/airfilter.html) done on it or is it totally stock (as in with the filter lip intact and upper deflector still screwed into the cover)?

thanks again
I tried that mod with a K&N, but the bike ran like it was cold I went back and cut the lip off the old filter and installed it on the K&N and she runs good now, so I attributed the problem to inner airbox turbulence...
Old Apr 16, 2009 | 12:54 PM
  #34  
RCVTR's Avatar
Senior Member
SuperBike
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,689
From: South Lake Tahoe, CA, USA
RCVTR is an unknown quantity at this point
Originally Posted by FL02SupaHawk996
I tried that mod with a K&N, but the bike ran like it was cold I went back and cut the lip off the old filter and installed it on the K&N and she runs good now, so I attributed the problem to inner airbox turbulence...
That's just what I believe the air dam is for.

the way I see it, the air dam causes the air to flow up along the top of the box. The filter is drawing air downward and since the air enters at the top, it creates streamlines that vector downward and enter the filter at ~90 degrees.

Remove the dam, and the air goes everywhere.

Just a thought...
I have no data to verify.
Old Apr 16, 2009 | 12:58 PM
  #35  
FL02SupaHawk996's Avatar
Fastest Color
SuperBike
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,091
From: Lithia, FL
FL02SupaHawk996 is on a distinguished road
Originally Posted by RCVTR
That's just what I believe the air dam is for.

the way I see it, the air dam causes the air to flow up along the top of the box. The filter is drawing air downward and since the air enters at the top, it creates streamlines that vector downward and enter the filter at ~90 degrees.

Remove the dam, and the air goes everywhere.

Just a thought...
I have no data to verify.
That's exactly what I experienced, so for all those folks that made that mod work, I'm scratching my head how???
Old Apr 17, 2009 | 07:25 AM
  #36  
MC Leather's Avatar
Senior Member
Back Marker
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 129
MC Leather is on a distinguished road
Originally Posted by mikstr
MC, was the "Burnie Morgan" mod (http://www.burniemorgan.com/firestorm/airfilter.html) done on it or is it totally stock (as in with the filter lip intact and upper deflector still screwed into the cover)?

thanks again
The Burnie mod wasn't done. That part looks stock.
Old Apr 17, 2009 | 07:28 AM
  #37  
mikstr's Avatar
Senior Member
MotoGP
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,631
From: Montreal
mikstr is on a distinguished road
cheers
Old Apr 17, 2009 | 08:10 AM
  #38  
RCVTR's Avatar
Senior Member
SuperBike
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,689
From: South Lake Tahoe, CA, USA
RCVTR is an unknown quantity at this point
I think MCs bike made 135-140 HP when it was fresh, on race gas.
Old Apr 17, 2009 | 08:13 AM
  #39  
mikstr's Avatar
Senior Member
MotoGP
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,631
From: Montreal
mikstr is on a distinguished road
Pretty impressive numbers!!!!!

Further to this discussion (and my recent dyno numbers), I have decided to put the airbox and filter completely back to OEM. I'm done experimenting with this stuff. If the likes of Bob H and Roger D weren't able to improve on the stock design, who am I to think I can. The airbox lab is now closed, lol
Old Apr 17, 2009 | 09:15 AM
  #40  
Tweety's Avatar
Out of my mind, back in 5
MotoGP
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 6,109
From: Skurup, Sweden
Tweety is on a distinguished road
Originally Posted by FL02SupaHawk996
That's exactly what I experienced, so for all those folks that made that mod work, I'm scratching my head how???
I'm running that mod on a stock filter and it works there... I did try it on a K&N and it made the gaping hole even worse... I can't back it up with dyno sheets, but the *** dyno says it makes fueling a bit more even (could be interpreted as equally bad though?!)

And my own DIY tuning dyno says the same... No fancy electronics, just A/F and a basic calculated power to compare my own results to each other... I use it for tuning and comparing setups, and then if I want a dyno sheet I'd go to the local shop... Haven't bothered yet though...
Old Apr 17, 2009 | 09:18 AM
  #41  
Tweety's Avatar
Out of my mind, back in 5
MotoGP
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 6,109
From: Skurup, Sweden
Tweety is on a distinguished road
Originally Posted by mikstr
Pretty impressive numbers!!!!!

Further to this discussion (and my recent dyno numbers), I have decided to put the airbox and filter completely back to OEM. I'm done experimenting with this stuff. If the likes of Bob H and Roger D weren't able to improve on the stock design, who am I to think I can. The airbox lab is now closed, lol
I kinda came to the same conclusion a while ago... I'm on the fence on the burnie mod (wich I'm running) but gave up on the K&N as it just pissed me off... Last one I owned was saturated in gasoline and set on fire to calm my nerves...
Old Apr 18, 2009 | 02:24 AM
  #42  
shayne's Avatar
Senior Member
SuperSport
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 963
From: Sunshine Coast, Australia
shayne is on a distinguished road
Originally Posted by RCVTR
I wonder how much you will need to modify the needle profiles to get the thing to run like that. Sounds like a can of worms, when the stock airbox is good to 130+ HP.

150 HP is another story. Can't get there. But to get to 150 HP, if the engine is making 65 ft-lb of torque you have to have over 12k RPM. and cams to match. Maybe you can make a bit more torque at drop the revs a bit. At 70 ft-lb, the revs drop to 11,250, which I think is more like what the race engines did. But in any case, the engine is higly stressed.

We're building street engines here.

My experiments showed that needle profile wasn't the problem. It was the airflow change affecting the slides, as has been suggested slesewhere in this thread. I tried all needle settings, including some HRC needles which are waaaay richer than anything else, and it made no differnce.

I have increased compression (10:1) and billet velocity stacks, and my modified airbox and bigger airfilter would not work. Good luck with it Flo. Here is my tip. It is about the slides I think. You will need to find out a way to keep them working smoothly. Perhaps spring rates are the answer, unless you are going to flat slides.
Old Apr 18, 2009 | 05:06 AM
  #43  
gboezio's Avatar
Senior Member
SuperSport
SuperSport
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 880
From: Victoriaville, Quebec, Canada
gboezio is on a distinguished road
At 100% VE, 111 hp@9500 RPM, 130 hp@11000 RPM, 140 hp@12000 RPM
This is assuming perfect breathing, matched cams, ports, compression, separate exhausts...
So, can the stock crank handle such a beating, it seem to be way over it's design, are they making billet or forged cranks ??
Or using Al or Ti rods with mini skirts pistons, someone could crank up some revs, but it's a lot of money for a street bike, specially Al rods that need to be changed as regular maintenance...
Two 4340 Carrillo rods with ultralight pistons could do the trick, no overbore (this is often argued but I'm stiff on this), stiffer valve springs, Cams, compression, exhaust, velocity stacks and timing need to be optimized for the last 500-1000 RPM to bump the curve.
Fuel injection would be a must

Last edited by gboezio; Apr 18, 2009 at 05:23 AM.
Old Apr 18, 2009 | 07:54 AM
  #44  
MC Leather's Avatar
Senior Member
Back Marker
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 129
MC Leather is on a distinguished road
Originally Posted by RCVTR
I think MCs bike made 135-140 HP when it was fresh, on race gas.
I could see that, when we dynoed the bike it was way lean already... we figured with jetting changes and good race gas we could find 5 more HP. Add to that the motor is not so young any anymore, 140hp would not be to hard to see.

What would be hard is riding it. The last thing that bike needs is more power. The suspension is about 90% sorted, the cosmetics are almost done. I just need to change a few more little things and she will be all set. But it's a hard bike to ride fast. I just wish it felt better on the brakes and the front wheel would stay put.
Old Apr 19, 2009 | 04:28 AM
  #45  
shayne's Avatar
Senior Member
SuperSport
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 963
From: Sunshine Coast, Australia
shayne is on a distinguished road
My memory tells me that about 140hp was the limit for the stock crank, and after that they broke. Moriwaki made a billet crank for them, but it cost a fortune and they were hard to get. If they were still available then Revolution Racing in the UK would be the first place to ask I reckon. They will know for sure.

If you are aiming for this type of power, then I really think you should consider whether the engine will just overpower the chassis. The VTR is just not designed for it in my opinion. I think you would need to factor in some serious mods to frame and suspension, and then you may just be better off buying another bike, such as an SP2 or a Ducati.
Old Apr 19, 2009 | 09:37 AM
  #46  
Tweety's Avatar
Out of my mind, back in 5
MotoGP
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 6,109
From: Skurup, Sweden
Tweety is on a distinguished road
I think also the reason for the bracing on the swingarm and added mountings for the pivot bolt comes into play at about 130 hp... That's about what the stock pivot will handle... Above that you might get into trouble...
Old Apr 20, 2009 | 08:10 AM
  #47  
RCVTR's Avatar
Senior Member
SuperBike
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,689
From: South Lake Tahoe, CA, USA
RCVTR is an unknown quantity at this point
Bob was able to make ~140 HP reliably. Stage 3 cams were available, but would break the stock crank, even after substantial lightening, Carillo rods, etc. He was advised of this by Mr. Moriwaki. To my knowledge, he never broke a crank. He did have a brittle wrist pin that shattered and the case was about sawn in half by the time he got it shut down.

Even with substantial bracing, the chassis was overpowered. He has described laying up on the tank and just letting the ***-end shake until it was done shaking when hard on the gas. People behind him wondered how he rode it.
Old Jun 9, 2009 | 01:24 PM
  #48  
BiggDaddyKool's Avatar
Senior Member
Back Marker
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 150
From: Riceville, Tennessee
BiggDaddyKool is on a distinguished road
Originally Posted by RCVTR
Bob was able to make ~140 HP reliably. Stage 3 cams were available, but would break the stock crank, even after substantial lightening, Carillo rods, etc. He was advised of this by Mr. Moriwaki. To my knowledge, he never broke a crank. He did have a brittle wrist pin that shattered and the case was about sawn in half by the time he got it shut down.

Even with substantial bracing, the chassis was overpowered. He has described laying up on the tank and just letting the ***-end shake until it was done shaking when hard on the gas. People behind him wondered how he rode it.
Im 6'4 265lbs (no Gear) and I cant hold my SH down in 1st gear to save my life and Im still way lean. Roll-on 1st and 2nd gear wheelies are very impressive to onlookers though LoL
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
kshuart
Classifieds
1
May 11, 2009 08:26 AM
mikstr
Modifications - Performance
3
Apr 25, 2007 08:30 PM
mikstr
Technical Discussion
28
Mar 21, 2007 02:32 AM
mikstr
Modifications - Performance
3
Feb 14, 2007 05:35 PM
EngineNoO9
General Discussion
4
Sep 11, 2006 01:16 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:23 PM.