530 chain works with 16/42 sprocket???
#1
530 chain works with 16/42 sprocket???
hi guys...
got some unfortunate news from my mechanic guy today...the wrong rear sprocket was shipped from sprocketcenter.com and does not fit my shawk ...i ordered 530 DID chain with stock 16/41 sprockets...except sprocketcenter ran out and can only ship me a 42 rear sprocket as exchange. crap!
long story short, will the 42 rear sprocket work with the 16 front and 530 chain? or will my guy have to cut the chain to make it fit???
and will that affect the bike at all????
thank you!!!
got some unfortunate news from my mechanic guy today...the wrong rear sprocket was shipped from sprocketcenter.com and does not fit my shawk ...i ordered 530 DID chain with stock 16/41 sprockets...except sprocketcenter ran out and can only ship me a 42 rear sprocket as exchange. crap!
long story short, will the 42 rear sprocket work with the 16 front and 530 chain? or will my guy have to cut the chain to make it fit???
and will that affect the bike at all????
thank you!!!
#2
If it's a 530 sprocket it will work without any problems. It will shorten the gearing ever so slightly (better than stock), but lots of guys here run 16/43 to shorten up the gearing even more.
Some of us even run a15/43 combination for a really revvy setup.
Some of us even run a15/43 combination for a really revvy setup.
#3
hey man thanks for the tip, i was really worried that i'd have to keep the bike at the shop even longer, hopefully the 42 sprocket will work out
how will this affect performance top-end wise, like on the freeway?
how will this affect performance top-end wise, like on the freeway?
#4
You can run 16/42 or 16/43 with a stock length chain...
Just FYI, running larger gears in the back lengthens the chain, so IF you were to run into problems, cutting the chain wouldn't solve it. You'd have to buy a new (longer) chain... you won't need to worry about this with a 16/42 gear ratio though.
Also I believe that the 520/525/530 designates the weight/strength of the chain and has no relation to the length. The smaller the number you have, the lighter the chain (faster rev up, but wears out quicker). So the 530 relates how the sprocket is designed (width and such) and not to the number of teeth it has.
Edit: Freeway speeds are still plenty fine, you will be running at higher revvs, but you will be way past the speed limits before you are out of this bike's comfort zone... you'll more than likely be pleased with the benefits of a 16/42 gear ratio.
Just FYI, running larger gears in the back lengthens the chain, so IF you were to run into problems, cutting the chain wouldn't solve it. You'd have to buy a new (longer) chain... you won't need to worry about this with a 16/42 gear ratio though.
Also I believe that the 520/525/530 designates the weight/strength of the chain and has no relation to the length. The smaller the number you have, the lighter the chain (faster rev up, but wears out quicker). So the 530 relates how the sprocket is designed (width and such) and not to the number of teeth it has.
Edit: Freeway speeds are still plenty fine, you will be running at higher revvs, but you will be way past the speed limits before you are out of this bike's comfort zone... you'll more than likely be pleased with the benefits of a 16/42 gear ratio.
Last edited by 7moore7; 02-11-2011 at 10:42 PM.
#6
You can run 16/42 or 16/43 with a stock length chain...
Just FYI, running larger gears in the back lengthens the chain, so IF you were to run into problems, cutting the chain wouldn't solve it. You'd have to buy a new (longer) chain... you won't need to worry about this with a 16/42 gear ratio though.
Also I believe that the 520/525/530 designates the weight/strength of the chain and has no relation to the length. The smaller the number you have, the lighter the chain (faster rev up, but wears out quicker). So the 530 relates how the sprocket is designed (width and such) and not to the number of teeth it has.
Edit: Freeway speeds are still plenty fine, you will be running at higher revvs, but you will be way past the speed limits before you are out of this bike's comfort zone... you'll more than likely be pleased with the benefits of a 16/42 gear ratio.
Just FYI, running larger gears in the back lengthens the chain, so IF you were to run into problems, cutting the chain wouldn't solve it. You'd have to buy a new (longer) chain... you won't need to worry about this with a 16/42 gear ratio though.
Also I believe that the 520/525/530 designates the weight/strength of the chain and has no relation to the length. The smaller the number you have, the lighter the chain (faster rev up, but wears out quicker). So the 530 relates how the sprocket is designed (width and such) and not to the number of teeth it has.
Edit: Freeway speeds are still plenty fine, you will be running at higher revvs, but you will be way past the speed limits before you are out of this bike's comfort zone... you'll more than likely be pleased with the benefits of a 16/42 gear ratio.
As for the 42 rear, no worries there. This is arguably the cheapest performance upgrade you can do. I run a larger 43 tooth rear and have contemplated a 44. My bike now is strictly for track riding and any change in sprockets will affect revs and gear selection in different parts of the track.
[IMG]file:///C:/DOCUME%7E1/Denis/LOCALS%7E1/Temp/moz-screenshot.png[/IMG]
#7
Odd that sprocket center shipped the wrong sprocket. I ordered mine from them last week also. converted to 520 with a DID 520zvmx chain with 16 front and 43 stealth rear. They were out of the 43 and called me to tell me it was back ordered. Asked me if I wanted a 44 or 42 and I told them I would wait for the 43. With over 2 feet of snow on the ground I told them waiting a bit was not an issue
#9
Odd that sprocket center shipped the wrong sprocket. I ordered mine from them last week also. converted to 520 with a DID 520zvmx chain with 16 front and 43 stealth rear. They were out of the 43 and called me to tell me it was back ordered. Asked me if I wanted a 44 or 42 and I told them I would wait for the 43. With over 2 feet of snow on the ground I told them waiting a bit was not an issue
the exchange was a bit confusing though. since they were out 41s Chad said he could ship a 42 or 43...it was hard to decide on the spot without reading up on the effect, but to not lose time in shop i agreed to the 42, and immediately logged on to superhawk forum to see if i made the right choice.
looks like i did?
#10
You made one of a possible few "right" choices... for some people, 15/44 is the right choice, for some the stock 16/41 is.
Super vague way to say it, I know. But, for most people and situations, yeah you made a choice that is an upgrade. And works with your stock 102 length chain.
8541Hawk- that pick is great... I've never had it illustrated that simply before.
Super vague way to say it, I know. But, for most people and situations, yeah you made a choice that is an upgrade. And works with your stock 102 length chain.
8541Hawk- that pick is great... I've never had it illustrated that simply before.
#11
picked up my shawk yesterday, noticed a slight increase in power in first gear...not that this thing needed more torque but any addition to speed is welcomed
also got my CCT changed to APE, adds a slight touch of red bling factor (and peace of mind), but he mentioned the manual CCT will not need to be adjusted once set...that can't be true right? especially during the first few months...when would i know that I have to make some adjustment to the APE CCT? sound? mileage interval?
next mod: RSI bar riser and superbike bar conversion
also got my CCT changed to APE, adds a slight touch of red bling factor (and peace of mind), but he mentioned the manual CCT will not need to be adjusted once set...that can't be true right? especially during the first few months...when would i know that I have to make some adjustment to the APE CCT? sound? mileage interval?
next mod: RSI bar riser and superbike bar conversion
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
WordTooYoMamma
Classifieds
5
07-09-2015 08:56 AM
duran
Technical Discussion
16
08-27-2007 07:57 AM