How long before they try this in the U.S.
#1
How long before they try this in the U.S.
I saw this article this morning.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070329/...WuY4L1JIqhOrgF
the only bike accident i was ever involved in was when a car turned left in front of me. I was going a blistering 30 MPH on city streets. makes you wounder what they will try next
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070329/...WuY4L1JIqhOrgF
the only bike accident i was ever involved in was when a car turned left in front of me. I was going a blistering 30 MPH on city streets. makes you wounder what they will try next
#3
as long as they limit automobiles, trucks, and every other class of motor vehicle too....otherwise it's plain discrimination. Also funny how they never give %'s just total numbers - how about comparing total motorcycle deaths as a percentage of owners versus auto deaths vs total ownership. It's like saying there are more people drinking Starbux now than in 1990. Sigh.
#4
guys production stuff is already limited... most bikes that could reach beyond 187MPH are capped their. some with gearing some actually hav cylinder igntion kills that cut the fire to one plug to limit speeds... lots of cars now a days hav governers on them too. hell my 99 S-10 was set at 97mph... when you hit it the engine shut completly off tille you got down to 94mph then it would run again.
as for removing. the ones set by gearing are easy to change. the ones in the ECU r a bit tricky.
as for removing. the ones set by gearing are easy to change. the ones in the ECU r a bit tricky.
#5
Giving evidence to the committee, transport author Stephen Plowden said he could not see why anyone needed a bike with a top speed of more than 65 mph.
Well, for one thing, this is America, and we want it...WE don't Need cars that go over 70 mph, but it's America and we want it...We don't need 30 round banana clips for our rifles, but it's America and we want them...There is a lot O **** we don't need...but you got it...it's America and we want it...
They need to spend the time and money educating Joe Public about watching where the hell they are going...
Well, for one thing, this is America, and we want it...WE don't Need cars that go over 70 mph, but it's America and we want it...We don't need 30 round banana clips for our rifles, but it's America and we want them...There is a lot O **** we don't need...but you got it...it's America and we want it...
They need to spend the time and money educating Joe Public about watching where the hell they are going...
#6
First off, this is in the UK, not the USA.
2nd, it is plane stupid and dangerous, way too low of a limit, you would be in more danger on such a limited bike.
And 3rd fewer than 600 a year in the UK are killed on motorbikes, and while that might sound like a lot, how many bikes are on the road? I recall from the last time I visited our British friends, quite a few so that is probably not a huge %, my bet is that more are killed doing some other stupid common activity like crossing the street as a pedestrian.. should running speed be limited too?
2nd, it is plane stupid and dangerous, way too low of a limit, you would be in more danger on such a limited bike.
And 3rd fewer than 600 a year in the UK are killed on motorbikes, and while that might sound like a lot, how many bikes are on the road? I recall from the last time I visited our British friends, quite a few so that is probably not a huge %, my bet is that more are killed doing some other stupid common activity like crossing the street as a pedestrian.. should running speed be limited too?
#8
Seeing as how we are living a "similar but different" remedy here in Quebec (drive up the price of licence plates..on sport bikes mostly of course, 'cause we all known that neophyte baby-boomer Harley types never have accidents...right!!), it seems to me that they should focus their efforts on the real cause of the problem, incompetent and negligent automobile drivers who are the cause of most motorcycle accidents anyhow. Of course, it is politically easier to pick on motorcyclists for we are fewer in number. Gotta love them all-knowing bureaucrats.....
#9
70 Mph Limit is just stupid ! I think 120 mph would be about perfect.. Kind of level the playing field across the board LOL !...Truthfully though I have only had my SH over 115mph one time and it was on the back stretch at Atlanta Motor Speedway ( 145mph ) yes it was fun , But I am really not into the triple digit riding aymore ( Give me the curves anyday !) To hell with turning my myself into a 186 mph asphalt grenade !
#10
I think the whole idea is .
They've threatened this **** before, and with automatic systems tied into the ECU that send a signal when you exceed some certain mph. In the US it's unconstitutional. I dunno about the UK. I'd assume the same.
They've threatened this **** before, and with automatic systems tied into the ECU that send a signal when you exceed some certain mph. In the US it's unconstitutional. I dunno about the UK. I'd assume the same.
#11
most cars are speed limited to just below the speed rating of the stock OE tires. Your S-10 had either S or T rated tires, I forget which one is 97 mph. Check the sticker on the driver's door for the tire recommendation and you'll see the rating. This is done obstensibly for safety but really for economic reasons.
#12
It would never fly here in the U.S. There would be such an uproar of
protest. This would be bigger than that Nut job DJ from california that wanted drivers to open up thier car doors on lane splitters even though it is legal out there. The big groups like the AMA would step in with their big shot
lawyers, just like the NRA did with gun control. I don't think we have a whole lot to worry about.
protest. This would be bigger than that Nut job DJ from california that wanted drivers to open up thier car doors on lane splitters even though it is legal out there. The big groups like the AMA would step in with their big shot
lawyers, just like the NRA did with gun control. I don't think we have a whole lot to worry about.
#13
. . . it seems to me that they should focus their efforts on the real cause of the problem, incompetent and negligent automobile drivers who are the cause of most motorcycle accidents anyhow. Of course, it is politically easier to pick on motorcyclists for we are fewer in number. Gotta love them all-knowing bureaucrats.....
#15
Right again, Bird! There's also a discouraging fact that sport bike riders are out on their own when compared to the corporate types that ride Hardleys. If they rode solo like most of us do most of the time they would go to the morgue just as fast as we do. They don't because they only roll out on Sunday and they always ride as a group. And you can bet your bottom dollar that the corporate dog always has a couple of his lieutenants riding flanker with him.
#16
Right again, Bird! There's also a discouraging fact that sport bike riders are out on their own when compared to the corporate types that ride Hardleys. If they rode solo like most of us do most of the time they would go to the morgue just as fast as we do. They don't because they only roll out on Sunday and they always ride as a group. And you can bet your bottom dollar that the corporate dog always has a couple of his lieutenants riding flanker with him.
#17
Yea I know how in the UK, a lot of times you have to have a HP limiter installed on your bike after first getting your license (or age, cant remember which). That way all the squids running GSXR 1000s and R1s are by law restricted to something absurd like 39RWHP. At least for a year, thats not a bad idea, but its barely abided by.
#18
It's these careless morons that sit in an office all day that don't know **** about driving that are killing us. These are the ******** that need to be hauled out of their vehicles, charged with a serious bodily-injury crime and tried in a court of law. If they did **** like this using a gun they would be gone for decades. It should be legal for them to do it with a car??? No ******* way!!!
If you change the laws even these dipshits would have to pay attention. There's no incentive for them to drive responsibly now! They go home to the kids and we go to the morgue!
#19
This will never happen here in the states. We have ogenizations that will fight this and there are some other laws that I think would have to pass before they got that drastic. Like the whole driving while on your cell phone thing would have to be out lawed, manditory helmet laws would have to be passed. Like I said I don't see it happening here.
#21
I wish I could ride with a group and given my location you would think it wouldn't be hard. I live in the chicago suburbs. there are riders everywhere, but its tough to actually find someone near you that rides because the suburbs are so vast, and the riders tend to stay near a few select hotspots. hotspots that frankly attract squids like deep sea fish bait. I don't like going to these hotspots, and so never meet new riders. I've had to make my own riders instead. my wife and I got a couple whom we were friends with into riding. but unfortunately, the man was a squid waiting to come out and he crashed, just ahead of me at 100mph, and never took it back up. they ended up divorcing but the wife moved away so now I got nobody again. my wife rides too, but she rides a gs 500. not the best bike to try to keep pace with a superhawk. anyway, if any of you guys live nearby, please let me know. I just don't want to ride with idiots. and there are too many squid riders around here to differentiate.
#22
Senior Member
Back Marker
Back Marker
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Russell, Bay of Islands, New Zealand
Posts: 229
Think of the number of crashes, some quite severe, reported regularly on this forum.
And then think again about why these restriction ideas are constantly floated.
It is your job to avoid the dipshit that pulls out in front of you, regardless of the legal rights and wrongs. It is your job to stay on the road. It is your job to stay upright. Defensive driving means you have to think that every crash is your own personal responsibility. Otherwise you will die.
I am only too well aware that some of you will take personal offence at this. I look forward to meeting you and going for a ride with you, if you are still around.
Cheers
And then think again about why these restriction ideas are constantly floated.
It is your job to avoid the dipshit that pulls out in front of you, regardless of the legal rights and wrongs. It is your job to stay on the road. It is your job to stay upright. Defensive driving means you have to think that every crash is your own personal responsibility. Otherwise you will die.
I am only too well aware that some of you will take personal offence at this. I look forward to meeting you and going for a ride with you, if you are still around.
Cheers
#23
Think of the number of crashes, some quite severe, reported regularly on this forum.
And then think again about why these restriction ideas are constantly floated.
It is your job to avoid the dipshit that pulls out in front of you, regardless of the legal rights and wrongs. It is your job to stay on the road. It is your job to stay upright. Defensive driving means you have to think that every crash is your own personal responsibility. Otherwise you will die.
I am only too well aware that some of you will take personal offence at this. I look forward to meeting you and going for a ride with you, if you are still around.
Cheers
And then think again about why these restriction ideas are constantly floated.
It is your job to avoid the dipshit that pulls out in front of you, regardless of the legal rights and wrongs. It is your job to stay on the road. It is your job to stay upright. Defensive driving means you have to think that every crash is your own personal responsibility. Otherwise you will die.
I am only too well aware that some of you will take personal offence at this. I look forward to meeting you and going for a ride with you, if you are still around.
Cheers
Most guys i know have gone down on city streets at under 35MPH. Some due to inexpireance and some due to other motorist (drivers). theres only so much a rider can do to make himself seen to drivers. Most of the guys on this fourm that report accidents, usually take full responsibility, and seek advice to prevent more accidendts.
Accidents happen, are they unavoidable? sometimes. But if a rider gets careless on a curve, he may go down, shame on him. However, if a person puts their 3,000 pound vehicle in a bikes path shame on them. not all motorcycles have the handling and braking power of sport bikes, and some riders don't have that much expierance.
Of course riders should be personally responsible for staying on the road. But if any government says that restricting one form of transportation will make the roads safer, that is a joke. remember that the other vehicles on the road still go fast, like buses, trucks, cars, trains, and all the mainacs who drive them. If more folks got run over by cars would they reduce the cars power or make walking illegal? This may sound dumb, but think about why you never hear about people getting run over. However you always hear of that guy on the "racebike" that slamed into a car. Check out the article in the March 2007 issue of motorcyclist, titled "Who knew?" It's a real eye opener.
#25
Senior Member
Back Marker
Back Marker
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Russell, Bay of Islands, New Zealand
Posts: 229
Perhaps I need to spell out why I know what I am talking about: bear in mind it ain't where you're from but where you've ridden that's the point as to geography....
Over the last 35 years I would have covered something over 2,000,000 kilometres (1.6 million miles approx) on road bikes - I gave up counting at 1,000,000, and that was 20 years ago. I have ridden in the USA - yes, including So Cal, on sports bikes and others, often and as recently as last year - the UK, France, Spain, Italy, Switzerland, Germany, Japan, Singapore, Malaysia, and Australia as well as my native New Zealand.
(In NZ, incidentally, there is about the same ratio of cars per person as in So Cal, and the age of the fleet is much older, meaning they do not stop or steer nearly as well. And as for failure to indicate - here is where that was invented.)
I have been a certificated riding instructor and created my country's first advanced riding course in the early 1980s. I still compete internationally in historic road racing, and have trophies for road racing, drags, MX, and trials. Also compete in classic trials still.
And there's a lot of accumulated knowledge from the more distant past there, too, as my father and grandfather were in the motorcycle trade (the old guy from 1903...). None of this stuff is new.
If you do not have it in your mind that your crash is your problem, then crashes will be inevitable. Then you will join the stats that will persuade these **** to make ever-more-restrictive laws. We concerned riders are a minority whose votes will sway no-one, so political action is beyond us for self-protection.
If there are sufficient gory motorcyclists' body parts spattered across cars and trucks so that cleaning is too inconvenient for the drivers, then we will be legislated out of our sport. Too bad if it's their fault. Riders have been truthfully saying "It was not my fault" for decades: has anyone done anything about it? No. It is only up to us to look after ourselves, on a simple, individual, day-to-day basis. Riding, not "being seen". They see us and still kill us.
BTW - if you think I am some ******** who potters around on the road at great-granny speeds - no: the fastest I have ever been on a public road is 260kph; the fastest on a gravel road is 195kph; and my usual average speed on a long trip including meal, refreshment, and fuel stops is about 105kph. That having been said, straightline speed is not the point of the SH, which is why I like 'em.
Over the last 35 years I would have covered something over 2,000,000 kilometres (1.6 million miles approx) on road bikes - I gave up counting at 1,000,000, and that was 20 years ago. I have ridden in the USA - yes, including So Cal, on sports bikes and others, often and as recently as last year - the UK, France, Spain, Italy, Switzerland, Germany, Japan, Singapore, Malaysia, and Australia as well as my native New Zealand.
(In NZ, incidentally, there is about the same ratio of cars per person as in So Cal, and the age of the fleet is much older, meaning they do not stop or steer nearly as well. And as for failure to indicate - here is where that was invented.)
I have been a certificated riding instructor and created my country's first advanced riding course in the early 1980s. I still compete internationally in historic road racing, and have trophies for road racing, drags, MX, and trials. Also compete in classic trials still.
And there's a lot of accumulated knowledge from the more distant past there, too, as my father and grandfather were in the motorcycle trade (the old guy from 1903...). None of this stuff is new.
If you do not have it in your mind that your crash is your problem, then crashes will be inevitable. Then you will join the stats that will persuade these **** to make ever-more-restrictive laws. We concerned riders are a minority whose votes will sway no-one, so political action is beyond us for self-protection.
If there are sufficient gory motorcyclists' body parts spattered across cars and trucks so that cleaning is too inconvenient for the drivers, then we will be legislated out of our sport. Too bad if it's their fault. Riders have been truthfully saying "It was not my fault" for decades: has anyone done anything about it? No. It is only up to us to look after ourselves, on a simple, individual, day-to-day basis. Riding, not "being seen". They see us and still kill us.
BTW - if you think I am some ******** who potters around on the road at great-granny speeds - no: the fastest I have ever been on a public road is 260kph; the fastest on a gravel road is 195kph; and my usual average speed on a long trip including meal, refreshment, and fuel stops is about 105kph. That having been said, straightline speed is not the point of the SH, which is why I like 'em.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BiggDaddyKool
Technical Discussion
23
02-06-2008 07:50 PM