Baffelectomy vs aftermarket sound?
#3
Here's my list, in 'sound preference' order:
Leo Vinci
V&H 'siamesed' tips
Enhanced bafflectomy (rear baffle ground out to edge of pipe, holes drilled in 2nd baffle)
2 Bros/ normal bafflectomy
Jardine
I haven't heard Satos, ARTs or D&D's on a hawk, but have heard the D&D's on a TL, and they do sound sweet on a twin vs an I-4. I'd love a set of the V&H or Leos, (does Termigoni make SH pipes???), but cost and the aggravation from the wife aren't worth it.
Leo Vinci
V&H 'siamesed' tips
Enhanced bafflectomy (rear baffle ground out to edge of pipe, holes drilled in 2nd baffle)
2 Bros/ normal bafflectomy
Jardine
I haven't heard Satos, ARTs or D&D's on a hawk, but have heard the D&D's on a TL, and they do sound sweet on a twin vs an I-4. I'd love a set of the V&H or Leos, (does Termigoni make SH pipes???), but cost and the aggravation from the wife aren't worth it.
#4
If you do the full bafflectomy, they can be as loud or louder than aftermarket. A partial bafflectomy (drill holes in inner ring) isn't as loud at idle yet still breathes well when given throttle but not to the point of the full bafflectomy.
I put ducati termignoni CF pipes on a VFR and they ROCKED! Sounded like two VTR's running sided by side but with the exhaust beat timing just a tad off. Suh-weet!
I put ducati termignoni CF pipes on a VFR and they ROCKED! Sounded like two VTR's running sided by side but with the exhaust beat timing just a tad off. Suh-weet!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post