Shawks tire pressure
Thread Starter
Senior Member
SuperSport
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 834
From: Thousand Oaks, CA
Shawks tire pressure
My Frame says 250 kpa front and 290 kpa rear (granted its from Canada so it's a firestorm) but the conversion is 42 rear and 36 front. Should I always run lower in the front? In the canyons I usually run about 32 rear and 34 front. Commuting i run like 40r 40 f. That's a big difference from the frames recomendations. Am I way off par here?
Senior Member
Superstock
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 466
From: SF Bay Area
It all comes down to your tire, I run 34F(PP3) and 36R(PR3) on my hawk. See here (https://www.superhawkforum.com/forum...ve-moss-30348/) Good advise, and a nice heated read 
Senior Member
SuperBike
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,458
From: South of Live Free or Die & North of Family Guy
It all comes down to your tire, I run 34F(PP3) and 36R(PR3) on my hawk. See here (https://www.superhawkforum.com/forum...ve-moss-30348/) Good advise, and a nice heated read
As a general rule, if you no nothing about your tires or other details, I would stick to 32 - 34psi front and 36 - 38psi rear, till you figure out your best combination.
I would not have the rear tire with less pressure than the front.
Thread Starter
Senior Member
SuperSport
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 834
From: Thousand Oaks, CA
Whats the reason for a lower front pressure? I only weigh a buck fifty, I run Q3's, although that my change. I was hopin that the Q3 would wear slower than the Q2's but they seem to wear faster. I can't afford to slap on brand new rubber every 2-3 months. I commute on my bike plus "spirited" canyon riding on the weekends. Im gathering opinions on a tire that will outlast the qualifiers but not sacrifice grip for the canyons. Plus I change my tire pressure from higher when commuting to lower when canyon riding.
Well take off, eh.
SuperBike
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,206
From: QC, Canada
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
marmaladedad
Modifications - Performance
15
Jun 15, 2006 04:58 PM
