Modifications - Performance Discuss aftermarket and DIY performance modifications

Sprocket upgrades

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 25, 2015 | 10:33 PM
  #1  
Brj010885's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Squid
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 15
Brj010885 is on a distinguished road
Sprocket upgrades

Hey everyone I've had my SH since April this year and was wondering is a sprocket upgrade worth doing ? If so I would appreciate any feedback.
Old Jun 25, 2015 | 11:46 PM
  #2  
franz125's Avatar
Member
Squid
Squid
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 42
From: estonia,Tallinn
franz125 is on a distinguished road
What kind upgrade yoy think about?
Old Jun 26, 2015 | 05:39 AM
  #3  
Brj010885's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Squid
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 15
Brj010885 is on a distinguished road
Not sure

I want more acceleration at lower RPMs
Old Jun 26, 2015 | 05:49 AM
  #4  
scottiemann's Avatar
Senior Member
SuperBike
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,252
From: boston
scottiemann is on a distinguished road
oh snap!
Old Jun 26, 2015 | 05:55 AM
  #5  
E.Marquez's Avatar
Administrator
MotoGP
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,402
From: Kempner, TX
E.Marquez is on a distinguished road
-1 in front and +2 in the rear is common.. and what I use. My top end is limited to 148 indicated and real road speed (thank you speedo healer) but I enjoy the lower gearing used every ride more than concerned for a few MPH lost in top end I almost never use.

Others have used just a -1 in front because it's a cheaper swap and they felt it was "enough" for them.

Make sure you choose a quality brand sprocket.. I have been using Supersprox Stealth composite rears for about 9 years now on dirt, Supermoto and street bikes.
They have a steel chain ring mated to a lighter weight aluminum center. But last like a good steel sprocket

Last edited by E.Marquez; Jun 26, 2015 at 06:51 AM.
Old Jun 26, 2015 | 06:23 AM
  #6  
thedeatons's Avatar
Senior Member
SuperBike
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,510
thedeatons is on a distinguished road
The above post is backwards: -1 front/+2 rear is typical for quicker acceleration.

I use JT steel sprockets because they are of good quality, and are inexpensive. You can get them anywhere.

On the front I used a Renthal because i wanted it to have holes in it... Purely cosmetic.

James
Old Jun 26, 2015 | 06:53 AM
  #7  
E.Marquez's Avatar
Administrator
MotoGP
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,402
From: Kempner, TX
E.Marquez is on a distinguished road
Originally Posted by thedeatons
The above post is backwards: -1 front/+2 rear is typical for quicker acceleration.

I use JT steel sprockets because they are of good quality, and are inexpensive. You can get them anywhere.

On the front I used a Renthal because i wanted it to have holes in it... Purely cosmetic.

James
It is NOT (now )

Sorry for the fat finger response BC (before coffee)

I also use a Renthal front, but not for the "lightening" holes. They have GREAT tolerances on the shaft splines.. One of the best I have found. They always seem to fit better than other brands I have tried, to include many of the common brands names you will see posted in this very thread.
Old Jun 26, 2015 | 07:10 AM
  #8  
Wolverine's Avatar
Moderator
MotoGP
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,214
From: Gettysburg, Pa
Wolverine is on a distinguished road
My .02... I've been around the block with trying -1f and + in the rear. Settled on +2 on the rear only which is a 43 tooth (16t front). It's a subtle change which throws off the speedo about 8mph on average and the results are perfect for me. I have a 15t (-1) front I will probably never reuse if interested. It has very low miles and is a JT.
Old Jun 26, 2015 | 09:36 AM
  #9  
8541Hawk's Avatar
Banned
MotoGP
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,942
From: Lake View Terrace, CA
8541Hawk will become famous soon enough
Well you can go -1 in the front or +2 in the rear but anymore than that and you can just downshift one gear in the trans and have the same ratios as stock, so it has never made any sense to go that low to me.

Also when you start messing with gearing, you also change the wheel base of the bike which means you will also need to go through your suspension settings.

I have tried the alternate gearing and have gone back to stock as it works the best all around IMHO.
Old Jun 26, 2015 | 10:56 AM
  #10  
E.Marquez's Avatar
Administrator
MotoGP
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,402
From: Kempner, TX
E.Marquez is on a distinguished road

Also when you start messing with gearing, you also change the wheel base of the bike which means you will also need to go through your suspension settings.
Changing the gearing only has effect on the wheel base, if you choose to be lazy and not adjust the chain length to put the rear axle back in the range you want (had)....

I'd happily prove (again, as I have in the past) that most if not all street riders are unable to observe a difference in 5-25 mm wheelbase difference caused by adjusting the rear wheel fore / aft to adjust the chain slack.

10 repetition in a blind test, and I have yet to find a street rider that can correctly state where the rear axle was positioned, fore or aft in a 25mm range 8 of 10 times.. I've challenged and won this bet 7 times. Thats not scientific proof, nor is it covering all riders..Just a reasonable educated guess indicating most street riders will never notice a difference in wheel base change from just adjusting the chain or changing gearing and adjusting the chain while using the same OEM length chain.


Having never tested the idea and observation some will still claim they can tell.. .... Yup, heard that before too,,, pays your money, take the challenge... come be #8. Im sure some can tell.. lets see theres Marquez, Rossi, Code, Chandler, Roberts, and a few hundred thousand other talented racers.. but Johnny rider on the street is not likely to be one of them.

Last edited by E.Marquez; Jun 26, 2015 at 11:00 AM.
Old Jun 26, 2015 | 11:01 AM
  #11  
E.Marquez's Avatar
Administrator
MotoGP
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,402
From: Kempner, TX
E.Marquez is on a distinguished road
Well you can go -1 in the front or +2 in the rear but anymore than that and you can just downshift one gear in the trans and have the same ratios as stock

16/41 one gear lower is NOT the same as 15/43

http://www.gearingcommander.com/

Second: How do you change to gear zero? (one gear lower than 1st)

We get it, some do not prefer the final drive ratios provided by going -1+2 ... but some do.... based on how and where they ride.. thats not wrong, any more than choosing stock gearing.. Its just what the rider prefers.
So long as FACTS and actual riding observations are being discussed and not pulled from the behind guess are being used to make a adult educated decision..there is no wrong gearing..just what works for you.

Last edited by E.Marquez; Jun 26, 2015 at 01:45 PM.
Old Jul 7, 2015 | 04:46 PM
  #12  
8541Hawk's Avatar
Banned
MotoGP
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,942
From: Lake View Terrace, CA
8541Hawk will become famous soon enough
Originally Posted by E.Marquez
So long as FACTS and actual riding observations are being discussed and not pulled from the behind guess are being used to make a adult educated decision..there is no wrong gearing..just what works for you.
All I will say to this is really....... What a fine place where even the Mods go straight for the personal attacks.

So I guess I just pull things from out of my *** and guess just to see my post count go up....... ok

Though I guess my attitude would have to be, why even have a forum.... there is no wrong anything, just what works for you.......
Old Jul 7, 2015 | 04:58 PM
  #13  
scottiemann's Avatar
Senior Member
SuperBike
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,252
From: boston
scottiemann is on a distinguished road
Originally Posted by scottiemann
oh snap!
Old Jul 7, 2015 | 05:02 PM
  #14  
scottiemann's Avatar
Senior Member
SuperBike
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,252
From: boston
scottiemann is on a distinguished road
sorry my bad....

I'll add something usefull lol

where do you live and what do you use your SH for?

personally I've tried 16/41, 15/43 and 15/42. I like the latter because most of my riding is tight corners, rural roads and city driving. Very fast off the line but doesnt sacrifice too much top speed...
Old Jul 7, 2015 | 05:49 PM
  #15  
E.Marquez's Avatar
Administrator
MotoGP
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,402
From: Kempner, TX
E.Marquez is on a distinguished road
Originally Posted by 8541Hawk
All I will say to this is really....... What a fine place where even the Mods go straight for the personal attacks.

So I guess I just pull things from out of my *** and guess just to see my post count go up....... ok

Though I guess my attitude would have to be, why even have a forum.... there is no wrong anything, just what works for you.......
Actually Not sure if you know you're wrong or just mistaken?

It is not a personal attack when someone suggest what you posted is factually wrong?
Its not an opinion, it's math. This discussion is just tech you are taking personally...I assume because you were pointed out as being worng.

8541Hawk posted
Well you can go -1 in the front or +2 in the rear but anymore than that and you can just downshift one gear in the trans and have the same ratios as stock, so it has never made any sense to go that low to me.

Also when you start messing with gearing, you also change the wheel base of the bike which means you will also need to go through your suspension settings.

I have tried the alternate gearing and have gone back to stock as it works the best all around IMHO.
I stated that was not correct and showed you the math ..I never mentioned YOUR opinion other than to say, we should discuss the facts of it,
I stated
16/41 one gear lower is NOT the same as 15/43

http://www.gearingcommander.com/

Second: How do you change to gear zero? (one gear lower than 1st)

We get it, some do not prefer the final drive ratios provided by going -1+2 ... but some do.... based on how and where they ride.. thats not wrong, any more than choosing stock gearing.. Its just what the rider prefers.
So long as FACTS and actual riding observations are being discussed and not pulled from the behind guess are being used to make a adult educated decision..there is no wrong gearing..just what works for you.
and
Changing the gearing only has effect on the wheel base, if you choose to be lazy and not adjust the chain length to put the rear axle back in the range you want (had)....

I'd happily prove (again, as I have in the past) that most if not all street riders are unable to observe a difference in 5-25 mm wheelbase difference caused by adjusting the rear wheel fore / aft to adjust the chain slack.

10 repetition in a blind test, and I have yet to find a street rider that can correctly state where the rear axle was positioned, fore or aft in a 25mm range 8 of 10 times.. I've challenged and won this bet 7 times. Thats not scientific proof, nor is it covering all riders..Just a reasonable educated guess indicating most street riders will never notice a difference in wheel base change from just adjusting the chain or changing gearing and adjusting the chain while using the same OEM length chain.


Having never tested the idea and observation some will still claim they can tell.. .... Yup, heard that before too,,, pays your money, take the challenge... come be #8. Im sure some can tell.. lets see theres Marquez, Rossi, Code, Chandler, Roberts, and a few hundred thousand other talented racers.. but Johnny rider on the street is not likely to be one of them.
If being shown you are wrong is a personal attack, not sure what I can do.. Would you prefer everyone just always agree with what you post even when it's wrong?

Thats not a personal attack, just discussion you take personally.

Last edited by E.Marquez; Jul 8, 2015 at 06:01 AM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
duran
Technical Discussion
16
Aug 27, 2007 07:57 AM
vtromey
Classifieds
2
Apr 5, 2007 04:09 PM
Speed_Demon
Modifications - Performance
10
Jan 21, 2007 09:47 PM
skunkwerks
Classifieds
13
Jan 2, 2007 05:13 PM
Jim TT
Technical Discussion
8
Aug 18, 2005 10:38 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:01 AM.