Cool, my first bike was an '80 CB650C. Welcome aboard. Yeah if you have the means ride them both and see which you like better. Probably can't go wrong either way.

 

V Twin sound my friend..... V Twin sound.

 

Welcome to the forum... My first was a '73 Honda CB500 4 cyl but it normally ran well. Before the SH I had a '92 Nighthawk 750 which was a nice ride - I like SH better!

 

I'm 6'4" and Ive ridden both and own a VTR... I found the VFR was less leaned over but my knees and legs hurt after short rides... it was too cramped. My VTR I can ride all day, my back and arms get a little sore but my legs and knees never hurt. You can always get higher clip-ons or put some bar risers on ( search the threads) The VTR soudns awesome, and chicks dig teh rumble

 

The characters of the VTR and the VFR are so different this should be an easy decision. The VFR, great bike that it is, has never appealed to me. It's a better tourer than the VTR and has, I guess, better fuel range, but the VTR is much sportier and rougher around the edges from a character standpoint.

 

I didn't find that decision easy, Killer!

 

Honestly, I love the way the VFR sounds more, but the VTR is a VERY close second. It just sounds choppy and mean for a twin.

I need to find one to sit on. In the last six months, one has come up for sale around me.....lol

I thought of one other bike I wouldn't mind last night as well. For whatever reason, I have a soft spot for CBR600F2s...lol

Any Northeast Kansas/northwest Missouri member want to let me sit on their superhawk...lol?? The problem I'm having is that most of the bikes I like are few and far between by me.

 

Well, I guess I was just speaking for myself and the kind of riding I do.-) I have nothing against the VFR, but the personalities of the bikes are vastly different. I have a buddy who had a VFR identical to yours and I logged many miles on it. Very nice bike and superior to the Hawk in many ways for the long haul, but no match for the VTR for really sporty riding. Honestly, I haven't ever considered for a moment buying a VFR.
The VFR incarnation after the one you have is sportier, isn't it? And the newest version is a porker? Those are my impressions, but I really haven't kept up with the evolution of the VFR.

 

Both of the VFR versions newer than his are all porkier. Not just sportier looking but heavier. And you are correct when you say that the VFR and the VFR have very different personalities. But you are in my opinion wrong about the VFR no comparing to the VTR in sporty riding conditions and circumstances. I own both bikes and actually two VTR's, a VFR, plus a Hawk GT. The VFR when in the right hands can hold its own quite respectfully with the VTR. Believe it or not the little Hawk GT will out handle the VTR and the VFR on really tight roads. http://www.scpmc.net/cpg148/index.php?cat=10311 Here's a link to pics of my small collection of Hondas.

 

I was having trouble uploading that picture. . . had written two responses only to have to bail because the pic wouldn't load. Now my real thoughts about the two. The Superhawk came first. Every time I sit on the seat it's just like being home. The VFR is a very special machine and I agree with you guys that there hasn't been a VFR worth owning since 2001. The Superhawk is my passion for motorcycles - the VFR is like desert! I got a very special deal on the VFR otherwise I would not have it. Now that I have it - I CANNOT tell you which one is my favorite. There are lots of bikes out there like the VFR - there are lots of copy cat VTR's now but in it's day it was ( and still is today) the one and only.

 

The 1994-97 VFR was slightly heavier than the 1998-01 model. The latest one is heavier than either of the earlier versions.
We'll never settle the question of which bike can be ridden faster down a piece of curvy road; I'll just say that my opinion is that the Super Hawk has a rawer, sportier character to go with its less weight and more power.

 

Funny you should mention weight and power comparing the bikes. In reality the '98-'01 VFR and all of the VTR's are about the same hp. The VTR has more torque. 0 mph to 60 mph the VTR has it all over the 5th gen. VFR but the VFR 'WILL' catch and pass the VTR on the big end in the quarter mile. Now on twisty roads I'll give the handling nod to the VTR over the VFR but only slightly. They both handle like trucks compared to the most modern day sportbike offerings out there. What I like in the twistys with the VTR is it's engine braking characteristics. It's very easy to get into a rhythm and not need to use the brakes as much or as aggressively to be quick in the twistys. None of the 4's inline or "V" engine brakes as well.

 

Dude, don't get an SV650S. I had one. No power at all. You'll be bored off you *** in a week. The forks are soft and crappy. The ergos are terrible. If you want to be in pain for an hour, just take an pilates class or something. The SV650S is much more painful. The brakes are grabby, which goes nice with the spongy bob front fork. Decent to look at once you get the full lower fairing, unless you prefer the disembodied chicken head look.

Get a Super Hawk, a VFR, etc. If you must have an SV. . . sorry if I offended.