Modifications - Performance Discuss aftermarket and DIY performance modifications

What is the easiest front end swap?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 7, 2010 | 03:22 PM
  #1  
BLACK's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Squid
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 8
BLACK is on a distinguished road
What is the easiest front end swap?

Hi guys my next newb question.....

I've been reading about all kinds of front end swaps. I just took a look at a crashed vtr that has a bent fork leg.

I'd like to do a swap anyways so this maybe perfect.

After reading a few pages however I'm still a bit confused.

What's the easiest front end conversion? Is there a bolt on available? Maybe an older conventional front end from a CBR or something? Or any paticular upside down set I should be eye-balling?

Honestly I'd like the simplest solution. Don't want to have new stems made and such.

Thanks in advance!

One thing that is worrying me..... Do the honda upside down front ends (900,100, 929, 954, 51,...) have enough length to keep the geometry from being messed up?
Old Apr 7, 2010 | 03:29 PM
  #2  
mikstr's Avatar
Senior Member
MotoGP
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,631
From: Montreal
mikstr is on a distinguished road
Easiest one is a 96-97 CBR900RR. It is a direct bolt-on (same wheel, rotors, spacers,....). Do a search in the Knowledge Base, I posted a link which spells out exactly how to do it.
Old Apr 7, 2010 | 04:00 PM
  #3  
lazn's Avatar
Senior Member
MotoGP
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,132
From: Phoenix, AZ
lazn is on a distinguished road
As Mikstr said the early conventional CBR900RR forks are the easiest.

From what I can recall:

As for the USD ones if you use the "gull wing" top triple and mount your clipons below that then the 929-954 forks are long enough, with a flat top they'd be short. RC51 forks are long enough with either type of triple (they are longer than the 929/954 ones).

CBR1000RR are slightly shorter than all of the others, and work with the "gullwing" top triples but still end up slightly lowering the front. (I think..) I could be wrong though..

I have a 954 front end on mine and to get the handling I want I had to raise them about 11mm above the gullwing top triple. (not enough for a clipon, but the forks are still pushed up in the triples that amount)
Old Apr 7, 2010 | 04:46 PM
  #4  
BLACK's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Squid
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 8
BLACK is on a distinguished road
Thanks guys.... so I'm guessing the 900rr forks are bigger diameter? 43? 45? Uses the same 300 rotor though huh? Is there a brake upgrade tto go with the 900rr forks?
Old Apr 7, 2010 | 05:02 PM
  #5  
mikstr's Avatar
Senior Member
MotoGP
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,631
From: Montreal
mikstr is on a distinguished road
900RR forks are 45 mm and also have comp adn rebound damping adjustment

Here is your brake upgrade:
F4i/98-99 900RR/929/SP-1 calipers mated to a Nissin (19 mm) radial MC (mine came from a 2006 ZX-6R although various models also used it, inclusign numerous GSX-Rs). Steel lines, good pads and hang on!
Old Apr 7, 2010 | 05:15 PM
  #6  
BLACK's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Squid
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 8
BLACK is on a distinguished road
Awesome info! Thank you!

BTW, in searching the KB all I found was a front end "white paper". I sthat what you were reffering to earlier?
Old Apr 7, 2010 | 05:26 PM
  #7  
mikstr's Avatar
Senior Member
MotoGP
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,631
From: Montreal
mikstr is on a distinguished road
musn't have searched too intensively:
https://www.superhawkforum.com/forum...ad.php?t=19071
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
thedeatons
Technical Discussion
15
Nov 27, 2013 11:30 PM
icebud
Modifications - Performance
72
Sep 14, 2007 08:33 PM
GeMs
Technical Discussion
7
Sep 9, 2007 12:43 PM
windaddiction
Modifications - Performance
31
Jan 24, 2007 08:46 PM
captainchaos
Modifications - Performance
38
Jan 23, 2007 11:47 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:29 AM.