Modifications - Performance Discuss aftermarket and DIY performance modifications

Fork;Springs OK or re-valve needed?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 26, 2008 | 10:20 AM
  #1  
smokinjoe73's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
MotoGP
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,066
From: NYC
smokinjoe73 is on a distinguished road
Fork;Springs OK or re-valve needed?

I have RT springs valves (not installed yet) For city street use will the springs & oil level be an improvement? I have been told that revalving the honda vaves(by someone good) is the way to go. I live in NYC & ride daily so I cant send them somewhere for valving. I can do the springs tho. Are 90kg springs too heavy for the street?(200# rider & sometimes 2 up). Any help greatly appreciated.
Old May 26, 2008 | 02:03 PM
  #2  
drew_c14's Avatar
Senior Member
SuperBike
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,455
From: Williamsburg, VA
drew_c14 is on a distinguished road
Sounds like a good setup to me. You should notice a big improvement with springs and good fluid alone.
Old May 26, 2008 | 02:33 PM
  #3  
joshuatest's Avatar
OUCH... MY A$$ HURTS!!!
SuperSport
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 707
From: Elba, Ny
joshuatest is an unknown quantity at this point
Just so you know...

When Greg did mine. I shipped them UPS Ground to him, he had them the next day. He had them complete in one day, and when he shipped them back, I had them next day also...

Now mine where gone longer as I shipped mine out before he had the springs recieved yet, however if you wanted to have him revalve your's, I would imagine if you work out the time ahead of time with him, you could have them back in 3-4 day's total...

just a thought
Old May 27, 2008 | 04:17 PM
  #4  
Hawkrider's Avatar
Administrator
World Champion
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 105,287
From: Fulton, MO
Hawkrider will become famous soon enoughHawkrider will become famous soon enough
What Josh said....

Or you could ride up here on a weekend and I'll revalve them while you watch! It takes about 5 hours total.

.90kg/mm springs will overpower your stock rebound and compression damping will still not be correct. I highly suggest a revalve.
Old May 27, 2008 | 09:38 PM
  #5  
smokinjoe73's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
MotoGP
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,066
From: NYC
smokinjoe73 is on a distinguished road
I actually did install the 90kg springs with 130mm of oil from the top. It does seem over sprung, but still an improvement. Are the 90kg too heavy even with a revalve?
Old May 28, 2008 | 08:20 PM
  #6  
Hawkrider's Avatar
Administrator
World Champion
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 105,287
From: Fulton, MO
Hawkrider will become famous soon enoughHawkrider will become famous soon enough
That depends on your weight. I was running a 1.05 Ohlins spring at one point. I brake HARD! The spring rate is chosen to match the weight of you and your bike so that you can attain proper laden and unladen sag values.
Old May 29, 2008 | 02:13 AM
  #7  
smokinjoe73's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
MotoGP
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,066
From: NYC
smokinjoe73 is on a distinguished road
So I am about 200#. I brake hard (not HARD). But so far at least I am not bottoming anymore. Is this doable?
Old May 29, 2008 | 03:26 PM
  #8  
Hawkrider's Avatar
Administrator
World Champion
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 105,287
From: Fulton, MO
Hawkrider will become famous soon enoughHawkrider will become famous soon enough
Yes, it's doable, but if you want to go one step further then have them revalved.
Old May 29, 2008 | 04:20 PM
  #9  
joshuatest's Avatar
OUCH... MY A$$ HURTS!!!
SuperSport
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 707
From: Elba, Ny
joshuatest is an unknown quantity at this point
I gotta tell you man... I hated to have the bike down any longer since it had already been down because of my crash... But I am glad I went ahead and had Greg just do it all, and do it right...

If you've dug into it enough to have went ahead and resprung, why not go ahead and just have him revalve them for you...

I was very happy with the results from Greg, and he worked fast... Was worth the money by far, and outside of a fork swap that I'm sure I'll never do, I'm confident that the bike is right... sounds like your half way there, and since your in the same state, shipping times are quick, shipping prices are low, and in all honestly, Greg is so close to Albany area anyway, it is very doable to just take the ride up and get them done and set up for good..

just my 47 cents....

josh


PS.. Greg, i still get that advertising cut right? lol... just kidding...
Old May 29, 2008 | 08:28 PM
  #10  
Thumper's Avatar
Senior Member
SuperBike
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,015
Thumper is an unknown quantity at this point
Revalve, springs are just half of the equation.

You will be much happier with both......
Old May 30, 2008 | 08:06 AM
  #11  
RCVTR's Avatar
Senior Member
SuperBike
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,689
From: South Lake Tahoe, CA, USA
RCVTR is an unknown quantity at this point
I'd say springs are way less than half the equation. Damping provides the control of supension travel.
Old May 30, 2008 | 08:28 AM
  #12  
Moto Man's Avatar
Duc Hawk
SuperSport
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 691
From: Malibu's canyons
Moto Man is on a distinguished road
The PO on my bike says he put Race Tech gold valves in but kept the stock springs. I can't compare to a stock ride but to me it feels like it bottoms out way too easy (eg. when pulling into a driveway at about 5-10mph and hitting a 1 inch lip) unless I have the preload set to 2 lines or less. Then the ride is preetty harsh. Does that sound normal for a 195# rider? I have no idea what weight of fork oil is in there or how much. Guess I'll just have to drain it and refill to be sure. Might as well upgrade the springs while in there.

Last edited by Moto Man; May 30, 2008 at 08:31 AM.
Old May 30, 2008 | 04:53 PM
  #13  
joshuatest's Avatar
OUCH... MY A$$ HURTS!!!
SuperSport
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 707
From: Elba, Ny
joshuatest is an unknown quantity at this point
Originally Posted by Moto Man
The PO on my bike says he put Race Tech gold valves in but kept the stock springs. I can't compare to a stock ride but to me it feels like it bottoms out way too easy (eg. when pulling into a driveway at about 5-10mph and hitting a 1 inch lip) unless I have the preload set to 2 lines or less. Then the ride is preetty harsh. Does that sound normal for a 195# rider? I have no idea what weight of fork oil is in there or how much. Guess I'll just have to drain it and refill to be sure. Might as well upgrade the springs while in there.
I would assume that 195 is to much weight to use the stock springs properly...
Old May 30, 2008 | 10:28 PM
  #14  
RK1's Avatar
RK1
Senior Member
MotoGP
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,547
From: Way Out West
RK1 is on a distinguished road
Moto Man;

The original equipment fork springs suck for everybody. I had the same problem pulling in the driveway or hitting a pothole. I put a zip tie around one fork tube, shoved it down against the slider, and went for a normal around town surface street ride. When I stopped the zip tie was shoved up against the lower triple clamp. And I weigh almost 50 lbs. less than you. Proper weight fork springs for the VTR were the best $100 I ever spent on a bike.
Old May 31, 2008 | 10:22 AM
  #15  
Dan Cronin's Avatar
Senior Member
Back Marker
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 229
From: Massachusetts
Dan Cronin is on a distinguished road
RK1,

What springs did you go with and did you end up re-valving?
Old May 31, 2008 | 02:30 PM
  #16  
lowell's Avatar
Simi Valley, CA
Back Marker
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 182
lowell is on a distinguished road
I see that racetech has a chart that will select the spring rate determined by weight . That is probably close unless your 2up or very aggressive.

The oil flow valves is what I know flow too slow and cause compression lock.

What is the best way to increase flow with out becoming a pogo stick?
Old May 31, 2008 | 08:31 PM
  #17  
Hawkrider's Avatar
Administrator
World Champion
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 105,287
From: Fulton, MO
Hawkrider will become famous soon enoughHawkrider will become famous soon enough
Lowell, I got your PM and replied. The stock valves themselves are okay, particularly with a lighter oil. The problem with using a lighter oil is that the stock shimstacks cannot provide enough damping to properly control fork motion. That's why the revalve is required. With a heavier fork oil the damping is okay but then you get "hydraulic lock" on large bumps (sometimes combined with braking).
Old Jun 1, 2008 | 10:36 AM
  #18  
RCVTR's Avatar
Senior Member
SuperBike
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,689
From: South Lake Tahoe, CA, USA
RCVTR is an unknown quantity at this point
Also, with a higher spring rate, a higher force is required for a given suspension velocity. Therefore, a higher damping rate is also required at that velociy to control the force.

I agree with Greg. No valve modifications required with lighter oil, unless you know what it is you are trying to modify. The stock valves are very good.

Race Tech valves are vastly different than the stock valves. To install Gold Valves without significant shim stack modifications would likely result in far too little high-speed compression damping. With the porting in Gold Valves, all of the high-speed damping must be controlled with the stack. They do not transition to orifice damping.
Old Jun 1, 2008 | 03:46 PM
  #19  
lowell's Avatar
Simi Valley, CA
Back Marker
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 182
lowell is on a distinguished road
Would a change to the RC-51 front end be a cure all?

Except for the loss of steering lock of course..
Old Jun 1, 2008 | 04:23 PM
  #20  
Gregw's Avatar
Senior Member
SuperBike
SuperBike
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,031
From: Los Angeles ish
Gregw is on a distinguished road
The CBR1000 fork w/954 triples will keep the lock. Just a couple washers and you're good to go. To be honest, I only lock with the wheel turned left. I haven't tried to the right.
Old Jun 1, 2008 | 05:12 PM
  #21  
lowell's Avatar
Simi Valley, CA
Back Marker
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 182
lowell is on a distinguished road
did not know that .

Is that combination adjustable?
Old Jun 1, 2008 | 05:13 PM
  #22  
lowell's Avatar
Simi Valley, CA
Back Marker
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 182
lowell is on a distinguished road
Originally Posted by RCVTR

I agree with Greg. No valve modifications required with lighter oil, unless you know what it is you are trying to modify. The stock valves are very good.

So I can just replace the springs and refresh with a lighter oil to get close to correct?
Old Jun 1, 2008 | 06:24 PM
  #23  
Hawkrider's Avatar
Administrator
World Champion
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 105,287
From: Fulton, MO
Hawkrider will become famous soon enoughHawkrider will become famous soon enough
No, you are not understanding what we are saying.

A heavier spring combined with a lighter oil will throw your rebound damping out the window. It will be a pogo stick.

A heavier spring with heavier oil will allow rebound damping to be sufficient for the higher return spring force, but then you will be much closer to orifice flow (hydraulic lock) on compression to the point that it will be dangerous.

The limit for aftermarket springs with stock valving and oil is about .80kg/mm. That equates to about a 150# rider on the street. Anything heavier than that and you should revalve.

I'm not trying to sell anything here. I'm telling you the proper way to do this.
Old Jun 1, 2008 | 06:38 PM
  #24  
Gregw's Avatar
Senior Member
SuperBike
SuperBike
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,031
From: Los Angeles ish
Gregw is on a distinguished road
Originally Posted by lowell
Is that combination adjustable?
I have the '04-'05 forks which have preload, compression and rebound adjustments. Probably all years do, but not having looked at them, I'll not comment on them.
Old Jun 1, 2008 | 06:44 PM
  #25  
Hawkrider's Avatar
Administrator
World Champion
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 105,287
From: Fulton, MO
Hawkrider will become famous soon enoughHawkrider will become famous soon enough
04-08 1000RR forks are fully adjustable. 04-05 have about .93kg/mm springs and 06-07 have 1.0kg/mm springs with better valving.
Old Jun 1, 2008 | 07:04 PM
  #26  
Gregw's Avatar
Senior Member
SuperBike
SuperBike
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,031
From: Los Angeles ish
Gregw is on a distinguished road
I bought a stock CBR spring thinking it was .88kg. I saw that on the racetech website. Their spring calc said I'd be in the .89kg range so stock was closest. Now ya' got me wondering if I gotta start eatin more.
Old Jun 1, 2008 | 07:09 PM
  #27  
lowell's Avatar
Simi Valley, CA
Back Marker
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 182
lowell is on a distinguished road
I just need a solution soon. not riding the bike much till I get this front end dialed in. way too scary and twitchy
Old Jun 1, 2008 | 09:21 PM
  #28  
Hawkrider's Avatar
Administrator
World Champion
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 105,287
From: Fulton, MO
Hawkrider will become famous soon enoughHawkrider will become famous soon enough
You can ride the bike with stock suspension, just don't ride it fast!

Set your sag and rebound damping, front and rear for the time being.

If you insist on not riding it with stock suspension, with the RC51 fork swap you'll probably have the bike down for a while. It takes a while to collect all those parts, the clip-ons being the biggest hurdle.
Old Jun 1, 2008 | 10:43 PM
  #29  
Moto Man's Avatar
Duc Hawk
SuperSport
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 691
From: Malibu's canyons
Moto Man is on a distinguished road
This a great thread! One more question for you guys with the gift of deep suspension knowledge. Since I (supposedly) already have gold valves I should be able to run heavier oil once I switch the springs and should also set the stock shim stacks to ??? to control high speed dampning?
Old Jun 2, 2008 | 08:23 AM
  #30  
RCVTR's Avatar
Senior Member
SuperBike
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,689
From: South Lake Tahoe, CA, USA
RCVTR is an unknown quantity at this point
Greg's shim stack should keep you away from the region where the Gold Valves will "blow off" (meaning the damping curve goes horizontal). He may also have something that is designed for Gold Valves specifically. I very much doubt he'll just publish his stack. And the shim kit is about $200. My recommendation is to have him do the work, because he's done enough research and testing to know what works (and no, I don't work for him).

This should keep you away from having to care what valve you have, for most situations. Then you can run a lighter oil and have better control over the low speed region. The very high-speed damping, such as when you hit a big bump when hard on the brakes, or under heavy cornering loads may never be as well handled with Gold Valves. But the jury is out on that one. Some people swear by them. Others won't use them.

If you are someone who does get into a situation where the stock valves ramp up too quickly (on a particular section of road or track) after taking these first tuning steps, then you can increase the orifice size in the valve bodies. But I don't believe that would be recommeded as a first step.

Last edited by RCVTR; Jun 2, 2008 at 08:30 AM.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:51 AM.