Modifications - Performance Discuss aftermarket and DIY performance modifications

Biggest Change with a rear shock?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-07-2008, 09:38 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Back Marker
Thread Starter
 
DocPigskin17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 147
DocPigskin17 is on a distinguished road
Question Biggest Change with a rear shock?

So being not very mechanical or very knowledgable about suspension, I have a question. I am having Greg do my front suspension. I completely justify the cost for that. But seeing what the cost on an Ohlin rear shock is, what are some of the biggest differences I would feel with doing regular street riding by installing a Ohlin shock?
DocPigskin17 is offline  
Old 03-07-2008, 09:56 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
SuperBike
 
RCVTR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: South Lake Tahoe, CA, USA
Posts: 1,689
RCVTR is an unknown quantity at this point
The stock shock has poor damping capabilities. It makes up for low damping stiffness with high spring stiffness.

An aftermarket shock will have more sophisticated damping, allowing the use of a softer spring. The result is a much more supple feel from the rear end and the ability to adjust stiffness with damping. On the street, I would say the biggest difference would be in ride quality.
RCVTR is offline  
Old 03-07-2008, 10:10 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
SuperSport
 
SlowHAWK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Thornwood, NY
Posts: 817
SlowHAWK is an unknown quantity at this point
Honestly, once the front end stops diving and hitting hard on bumps after the rebuild, you'll notice the rear shock is pretty damn stiff. After I racetech'd my front, I noticed all of a sudden the rear shock felt worse. After finding a shock on EBAY, the bike really felt so much better.

J.
SlowHAWK is offline  
Old 03-07-2008, 10:26 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
Back Marker
Thread Starter
 
DocPigskin17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 147
DocPigskin17 is on a distinguished road
So, do you think by only doing the front that I will actually be worse off (comfort/performance) than with just stock suspension front and rear?
DocPigskin17 is offline  
Old 03-07-2008, 12:46 PM
  #5  
Moderator
MotoGP
 
superbling's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: South Texas
Posts: 2,553
superbling is on a distinguished road
Yup.

Stock, the front end sux more than the rear. Greatly improved the front and the rear's poor qualities will surface more readily.
superbling is offline  
Old 03-07-2008, 03:34 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
SuperSport
 
SlowHAWK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Thornwood, NY
Posts: 817
SlowHAWK is an unknown quantity at this point
You'll be happy with just doing the front... you'll be thrilled doing both... that's how I'd explain it. You should do the front regardless of your decision on the rear shock.

J.
SlowHAWK is offline  
Old 03-07-2008, 03:55 PM
  #7  
Administrator
World Champion
 
Hawkrider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Fulton, MO
Posts: 105,287
Hawkrider will become famous soon enoughHawkrider will become famous soon enough
Carl, when you hit a bump the front will pretty much absorb it. When the rear goes over it the back end will kick up which will transfer some weight to the front. This is pretty much what you'll feel. The front and rear will sort of be fighting themselves because they're not balanced. Now, we discussed the roads in your area and you said they were in pretty good condition, so you may not have any issues with the shock for a while.
Hawkrider is offline  
Old 03-07-2008, 06:31 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
SuperSport
 
comedo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 807
comedo is on a distinguished road
My experience with a Penske is as RCVTR described it. But another helpful effect with a higher quality shock is the ability to adjust it for carrying a passenger. I just add two turns of preload and set the low speed compression damping to the max. The bike is very stable and the suspension is, to use RCVTR's term, supple.
comedo is offline  
Old 03-07-2008, 06:54 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
SuperBike
 
RCVTR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: South Lake Tahoe, CA, USA
Posts: 1,689
RCVTR is an unknown quantity at this point
This is probably a good time to revisit the difference between spring stiffness and damping stiffness.

A spring applies a force that varies with the how far it is compressed. So the spring force is proportional to the suspension position.
A damper applies a force that varies with the rate of change of suspension position, or suspension velocity.
If you have damping that is linear and active over a wide range of velocities, you can use it to prevent overtravel on bigger hits, but remin soft over smaller ones.

This allows the use of a softer spring and suspension that works well over a wider range of conditions. That is where the supple feel comes from.
I believe the stock shock uses only orifice damping, so it gets really stiff at high suspension velocities.
RCVTR is offline  
Old 03-10-2008, 08:48 AM
  #10  
Senior Member
Back Marker
Thread Starter
 
DocPigskin17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 147
DocPigskin17 is on a distinguished road
Thanks everyone....

Hey, thanks to everyone who contributed to this post. It really helps out those of us who aren't completely sound mechanically but yet still love to ride the Hawk. All of your feedback is beneficial.
DocPigskin17 is offline  
Old 03-11-2008, 05:27 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
SuperBike
 
JamieDaugherty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Fort Wayne, IN
Posts: 1,858
JamieDaugherty is on a distinguished road
Originally Posted by RCVTR
The stock shock has poor damping capabilities. It makes up for low damping stiffness with high spring stiffness.
Except it's stock spring is too soft for most US-sized riders. I've found the damping AND the spring to be soft. Even with the stock spring I had the damping set at 1/2 turn out. Just my experiences...

Last edited by JamieDaugherty; 03-11-2008 at 05:29 PM.
JamieDaugherty is offline  
Old 03-11-2008, 09:06 PM
  #12  
WERA #44
Superstock
 
happytrack44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: About 57 miles south of VIR
Posts: 265
happytrack44 is on a distinguished road
Middle road mod

I installed a Hyperpro progressive rate spring on the stock shock and racetech springs on the front all a little heavier than my actual weight (about 195-200lbs) I used about a 13 weight oil and dropped the tubes about 20mm in the front. All together just under $300 for suspension goodies.
I don't ride aggressively enough on the street to justify the gold valves or the penske stuff, but she's very stable and smooth on the twisties and handles 2-up well.
I use the twin clickers and all that stuff on race bikes for knee down hard cornering, the only time I put a knee down on the street is crashing. We've all done enough of that.
happytrack44 is offline  
Old 03-16-2008, 08:30 AM
  #13  
Senior Member
Superstock
 
102dals's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Little Rock, AR
Posts: 442
102dals is an unknown quantity at this point
Talking

Anybody got any guidance about how to mount a new rear shock....

I have a Penske inbound and I don't want to take the whole subframe assembly off & kill my riding time.
A basic procedure would be helpful.
Thanks in advance....
102dals is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Fastforward
Technical Discussion
11
07-18-2011 01:17 PM
Sherm831
Technical Discussion
9
05-18-2010 07:07 PM
drew_c14
General Discussion
69
03-26-2008 01:11 AM
Cleveland
Everything Else
14
05-16-2007 10:23 AM
NOrrTH
Technical Discussion
3
11-25-2005 09:59 AM



Quick Reply: Biggest Change with a rear shock?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:43 AM.


Top

© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands



When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.