136 lbs torque WOW! (sarcasm)
11-23-2005, 12:55 PM
#1
Moderator
MotoGP
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: South Texas
Posts: 2,553
11-23-2005, 02:52 PM
#2
Senior Member
SuperSport
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Nananimo, B.C.
Posts: 764
Re: 136 lbs torque WOW! (sarcasm)
I've heard that comment a few times "Harley guys like it". Who cares? Am I supposed to think that because a Harley guy likes it, then it's gotta be a cool bike?
If we wanna stereotype, I think the average Harley rider is over weight.
If we wanna stereotype, I think the average Harley rider is over weight.
11-23-2005, 09:43 PM
#10
Senior Member
Back Marker
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Playa Del Rey ,CA
Posts: 222
Re: 136 lbs torque WOW! (sarcasm)
Item: Honda : Super Hawk (4592801893)
This message was sent while the listing was active.
biggreddog is the seller.
shortened pipes with restrictor plates to add back pressure. My original pipe design was 110hp 72 ft-lbs of torque. But it was just about open pipe design. Every month I would loose a baffle out the end of the muffler. if you put a bigger sprocket on the rear it will increase torque, But will change your over all speed. Ive gone down 1 tooth in the front and 6 up in the rear. Any other questions feel fre to ask. I know a guy up north that put over $10,000 into his engine on his superhawk and got 113hp and 125 ft-lbs. He asked what I had for internal mods, I told him Jet kit, pipes, and filter and he was upset. He was there when my bike was dynoed.
WELL I asked and the above was what he answered...hope this helps and boy its fun to be the one who digs for the dirt. hehe
This message was sent while the listing was active.
biggreddog is the seller.
shortened pipes with restrictor plates to add back pressure. My original pipe design was 110hp 72 ft-lbs of torque. But it was just about open pipe design. Every month I would loose a baffle out the end of the muffler. if you put a bigger sprocket on the rear it will increase torque, But will change your over all speed. Ive gone down 1 tooth in the front and 6 up in the rear. Any other questions feel fre to ask. I know a guy up north that put over $10,000 into his engine on his superhawk and got 113hp and 125 ft-lbs. He asked what I had for internal mods, I told him Jet kit, pipes, and filter and he was upset. He was there when my bike was dynoed.
WELL I asked and the above was what he answered...hope this helps and boy its fun to be the one who digs for the dirt. hehe
11-23-2005, 10:49 PM
#12
Senior Member
Back Marker
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Playa Del Rey ,CA
Posts: 222
Re: 136 lbs torque WOW! (sarcasm)
yeah no sh@#...you got me. the only thing i would spend 10000 on for my Superhawk would be a new gas tank!
12-23-2005, 07:24 PM
#13
Senior Member
Back Marker
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Springpatch, Flatland, Illinois
Posts: 114
Re: 136 lbs torque WOW! (sarcasm)
Hey guys, look! I bought a brand new bike, crashed it trying to be a stunta, and realized it was cheaper to put it back togeather with cheap *** bling **** than use the real parts. Now I gots a $10k bike [$8k purchase, $2k repairs] and I hafta brag it up to sell it because I am about to get repoed..
12-23-2005, 09:31 PM
#14
Remember stock is BAD!
SuperSport
SuperSport
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Jacksonville FL
Posts: 760
Re: 136 lbs torque WOW! (sarcasm)
That has to be a bad dyno reading! Those numbers dont make ANY sense.
I can get 136lbs of torque out of my shawk by richening it up, but I will toss all of the oil that is in my pan - out of the exhaust within 5 miles.
Torque likes running way rich - His horsepower should have suffered Thats why I say the dyno reading is bogus
kept up with a duc 996 - with what type of rider on it? :wink:
Simply put he is on crack.
I can get 136lbs of torque out of my shawk by richening it up, but I will toss all of the oil that is in my pan - out of the exhaust within 5 miles.
Torque likes running way rich - His horsepower should have suffered Thats why I say the dyno reading is bogus
kept up with a duc 996 - with what type of rider on it? :wink:
Simply put he is on crack.
12-25-2005, 04:47 PM
#16
Senior Member
Superstock
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 428
Okay, now I see what happened. The bike was dyno'ed as a four cylinder! It only recorded half the RPM's. Kinda like when you set a tach for a V8 engine and hook it to a four banger. You get half the true RPM. The dyno measures total output (hp) and uses the rpm to calculate torque.
You have to divide the torque by two. Peak torque is 68lbs at the rear wheel. The hp should be accurate but you have to multiply the rpm by two.
You have to divide the torque by two. Peak torque is 68lbs at the rear wheel. The hp should be accurate but you have to multiply the rpm by two.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
