Modifications - Performance Discuss aftermarket and DIY performance modifications

Cans Vs Mileage?

Old Jun 26, 2004 | 08:36 AM
  #3  
mamisano's Avatar
Super Moderator
Back Marker
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 213
From: Deer Park, NY
mamisano is an unknown quantity at this point
The only reason I can see Mileage going down is because you will find youself using the right wrist a bit more to hear the beautiful symphony of a V-Twin at full tilt

Love my Jardines, wouldn't give them up for anything...Like 'em better than my friend's VTR with Erions.
Old Jun 30, 2004 | 03:34 AM
  #4  
nomead's Avatar
Junior Member
Squid
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 22
From: Long Island,NY
nomead
Anyone have sound clips of any pipes? Thinking it might be cool of we could get the various ones posted for comparison.
Old Jun 30, 2004 | 09:31 AM
  #5  
mamisano's Avatar
Super Moderator
Back Marker
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 213
From: Deer Park, NY
mamisano is an unknown quantity at this point
Good idea, I will try and find a way to store sound clips on the site. Also going to add an update to enable file attachments.
Old Jul 12, 2004 | 11:26 AM
  #9  
john2kvtr's Avatar
Member
Squid
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 31
From: Arlington, Texas, USA
john2kvtr
Re: Cans Vs Mileage?

Greg Nemish's website has some sound clips of the baffelectomy and Staintune pipes. Greg's Honda V-Twin Sportbikes Online site

http://webpages.charter.net/gnemish/index.html

Click the VTR1000F word in the red banner, then the Performance and Mods and Exhaust Bafflectomy.
Old Aug 2, 2004 | 11:44 PM
  #11  
tjayswift's Avatar
Member
Squid
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 30
From: East TN
tjayswift
Re: Cans Vs Mileage?

Originally Posted by smitty";p=&quot
the idea of adding aftermarket exhaust for a few horses and a nice rumble is attractive...but is it going to add to the bikes fuel consumption?
My fuel mileage sucks either way. The difference is totally negligable. I've found that I can make up or lose more fuel mileage in my choice of gears than anything else. I've used the stock and two sets of aftermarkets, and have noticed little to no difference whatsoever.

Just do what makes ya happy.
Old Dec 17, 2004 | 03:05 AM
  #12  
Rollingalong's Avatar
Senior Member
Back Marker
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 205
Rollingalong
Re: Cans Vs Mileage?

I believe the carbs get too much signal from the motor . My 2003 had crackin throttle response which is a good thing but the combo of short camshaft overlap and one 48mm carb feeding the near 500cc cylinder hurts them most .

Thats 24mm of carb for 250cc . Some old Honda 90's kitted to 104cc run that large a carb .

I think some recent motor work I've done will make for a more efficient engine at cruise speed . Time will tell but thats usually the norm when making positive Brake Mean Efficiency upgrades .

Just to further the info an old VW 1600cc Beetle only got 24-26 mpg real world with a single small carb . Simple cam change and dual carbs made for 36mpg at cruise speed with exhaust of course .

A 1979 Honda CBX I had only got 19-22 mpg when driven with a heavy throttle hand and near same for 1978 Zuki GS1000 with the dumb little Subaru type cams . Pipe , Andrews drop in G3 cams and 29mm smooth bores made for a marked increase in power and efficiency .
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Rollin20z
Modifications - Cosmetic
17
Mar 21, 2010 09:38 PM
Auron
General Discussion
18
Apr 27, 2007 08:37 PM
thehandyman
General Discussion
5
Mar 25, 2007 06:26 AM
joshn569
General Discussion
10
Feb 28, 2007 09:02 AM
malken00
Technical Discussion
5
Oct 25, 2006 08:56 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:00 AM.