bypassin the carb warmer?
04-30-2010, 09:22 PM
#1
mad skill collector
Squid
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Hayward, San Francisco bay area: California
Posts: 77
bypassin the carb warmer?
I need to know if anyone has tried to remove the carb warmer lines from their bike? It seems to me that the fluctuations of performance could be linked to the temp of coolant running in the carbs... I am having problems like Uchi
and thought of the coolant heaters on the carbs , not sure I have seen this before on anyother bikes
please let me know what ya think...
and thought of the coolant heaters on the carbs , not sure I have seen this before on anyother bikes
please let me know what ya think...
04-30-2010, 10:33 PM
#4
Senior Member
MotoGP
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Way Out West
Posts: 2,547
Been over this at least a dozen times over the years. Waste of time. Nothing to be gained. Unless you've 1) disconnected the coolant tubes from the carbs and 2) are riding in sub freezing temps, problems you're experiencing have nothing whatever to do with coolant through the carbs.
The purpose of running coolant through the carbs is to prevent freezing in cold temps.
In other words, you can get in trouble if you disconnect them and ride in cold temps. In warm temps it doesn't matter, but there is never anything to be gained by going without them.
The purpose of running coolant through the carbs is to prevent freezing in cold temps.
In other words, you can get in trouble if you disconnect them and ride in cold temps. In warm temps it doesn't matter, but there is never anything to be gained by going without them.
Last edited by RK1; 04-30-2010 at 11:02 PM.
05-01-2010, 03:20 AM
#7
Out of my mind, back in 5
MotoGP
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Skurup, Sweden
Posts: 6,109
Actually unless you are at very low temps they are not warming anything... The flow there is absolutely nil in many cases...
I have seen it on a couple of Ducati's and Kawazaki vulcan has them, as well as BMW f650... I can keep going for a while... These are just bikes that I have worked on...
I have seen it on a couple of Ducati's and Kawazaki vulcan has them, as well as BMW f650... I can keep going for a while... These are just bikes that I have worked on...
05-01-2010, 06:26 AM
#9
Junior Member
Squid
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Mid-Tenn 106.2mi from the tail
Posts: 20
the honda engineers mite have been trying to keep the carbs warm to preheat fuel, you get a better combustion when you do so.due to the better atomization that fuel gets at higher temps. you wont see preheating fuel on fuel injected bikes do to the high pressure at witch the injectors disperse the fuel into the cylinder.
that high pressure atomizes the fuel better than preheated fuel on carbs. hence why injected bikes make more horsepower. atomizing is just a fancy way of saying the mixing of fuel and air, the more you can break down both in to smaller parts, the better the fuel and air will mix together, the better of a combustion you can get witch produces more horsepower.
that high pressure atomizes the fuel better than preheated fuel on carbs. hence why injected bikes make more horsepower. atomizing is just a fancy way of saying the mixing of fuel and air, the more you can break down both in to smaller parts, the better the fuel and air will mix together, the better of a combustion you can get witch produces more horsepower.
05-01-2010, 08:18 AM
#10
Senior Member
MotoGP
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Way Out West
Posts: 2,547
05-01-2010, 08:42 AM
#11
Senior Member
SuperBike
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 1,802
05-01-2010, 12:01 PM
#12
Senior Member
MotoGP
Join Date: May 2008
Location: San Clemente, CA
Posts: 3,451
Look at the throttle body of your fuel injected car. They all have coolant lines running to the throttle body for 2 reasons:
1) On older cars with carbs, the intake manifold was heated with exhaust gas to give better driveability during warm-up and to prevent carburetor icing in cold weather, below 40F. Pretty much the same for EFI, except coolant is used.
2) It also became an emission control device, by allowing quicker warm-up, which gets the fuel system running a leaner mixture (14.7:1) in a shorter time after start-up. It reduces hydrocarbons and CO in the exhaust during warm-up.
1) On older cars with carbs, the intake manifold was heated with exhaust gas to give better driveability during warm-up and to prevent carburetor icing in cold weather, below 40F. Pretty much the same for EFI, except coolant is used.
2) It also became an emission control device, by allowing quicker warm-up, which gets the fuel system running a leaner mixture (14.7:1) in a shorter time after start-up. It reduces hydrocarbons and CO in the exhaust during warm-up.
05-01-2010, 03:52 PM
#13
Junior Member
Squid
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 6
Many of the older cars (1959 Chevy Impala for example) had a valve in the exhaust that restricted flow and forced exhaust through passages in and under the carb to get it warmed up a little faster. However once the valve got warm enough it would open. I am unsure exactly how the superhawk works with the coolant lines (literaly just bought it) but the cars only forced exhaust through there till it was warmed up a little.
05-01-2010, 06:42 PM
#14
Remember stock is BAD!
SuperSport
SuperSport
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Jacksonville FL
Posts: 760
I recall hearing that older Kawasaki's use this method, because they had "carb icing" and cold blooded carb issues. Check 1980-1990 kaws.
As VTR surfer said
"the intake manifold was heated with exhaust gas to give better driveability during warm-up and to prevent carburetor icing"
In addition to this: it helped with better atomization of the fuel.
As VTR surfer said
"the intake manifold was heated with exhaust gas to give better driveability during warm-up and to prevent carburetor icing"
In addition to this: it helped with better atomization of the fuel.
05-01-2010, 08:33 PM
#15
Senior Member
MotoGP
Join Date: May 2008
Location: San Clemente, CA
Posts: 3,451
Many of the older cars (1959 Chevy Impala for example) had a valve in the exhaust that restricted flow and forced exhaust through passages in and under the carb to get it warmed up a little faster. However once the valve got warm enough it would open. I am unsure exactly how the superhawk works with the coolant lines (literaly just bought it) but the cars only forced exhaust through there till it was warmed up a little.
05-02-2010, 06:23 AM
#16
Senior Member
SuperBike
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: thorold ontario
Posts: 1,978
Not every car has it. A lot do but not every fuel injected car does. My 88 mustang did and it was a free trick to bypass it and make extra power. My 89 cavalier did aswell. My 97 cavalier however didn't have that option. I was gonna have mine removed but after reading here didn't after asking and reading. Its apparantly needed. It would make sense to remove them. Nothing worse than heating the air coming into the motor right.
Look at the throttle body of your fuel injected car. They all have coolant lines running to the throttle body for 2 reasons:
1) On older cars with carbs, the intake manifold was heated with exhaust gas to give better driveability during warm-up and to prevent carburetor icing in cold weather, below 40F. Pretty much the same for EFI, except coolant is used.
2) It also became an emission control device, by allowing quicker warm-up, which gets the fuel system running a leaner mixture (14.7:1) in a shorter time after start-up. It reduces hydrocarbons and CO in the exhaust during warm-up.
1) On older cars with carbs, the intake manifold was heated with exhaust gas to give better driveability during warm-up and to prevent carburetor icing in cold weather, below 40F. Pretty much the same for EFI, except coolant is used.
2) It also became an emission control device, by allowing quicker warm-up, which gets the fuel system running a leaner mixture (14.7:1) in a shorter time after start-up. It reduces hydrocarbons and CO in the exhaust during warm-up.
05-02-2010, 08:20 AM
#17
Senior Member
MotoGP
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Way Out West
Posts: 2,547
The VTR has a dual valve thermostat. When the engine is fully warmed up coolant flow to the carbs is shut off. Flow through the carbs resumes only if coolant temp drops below a certain point. Unless the thermostat is defective I wouldn't worry about the system robbing power or causing funky carburetion.
05-02-2010, 12:14 PM
#19
mad skill collector
Squid
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Hayward, San Francisco bay area: California
Posts: 77
alright, I learned alot of things I did not know. I found my problem as well. A stuck vacum slider, I hate those long springs. Thanks for
all the input, the thermostat on the VTR is more complex than most I have seen. I would compare it to a 3-way valve , nice.
all the input, the thermostat on the VTR is more complex than most I have seen. I would compare it to a 3-way valve , nice.
05-02-2010, 08:23 PM
#20
Senior Member
MotoGP
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: altoona, pa
Posts: 2,934
you could probably cut those springs in half if you drill your slides accord to jet kit instructions, i think. The springs that come with the jet kits are so wimpy you can install them with no drama. Actually, those long springs are no problem if you use a pencil to stabilize the spring while you compress it into the cap recess. then pull the pencil out and carefully release the spring inot the slide as you push the cap down. Just takes a little practice.
05-02-2010, 10:05 PM
#22
Senior Member
MotoGP
Join Date: May 2008
Location: San Clemente, CA
Posts: 3,451
You should have seen the dual diaphragm fuel pump on a 1950's Ford. One diaphragm sucked fuel from the tank and pushed it up to the carburetor, the other diaphragm operated the windshield wipers.
05-03-2010, 04:46 PM
#24
mad skill collector
Squid
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Hayward, San Francisco bay area: California
Posts: 77
what if ya got those confused? lol hey I ordered the dyno-jet kit and plan on drilling the slides as they indicate,
as for the coolant lines I might try to loop them without the carbs while I make adjustments. It may just help on R/R time, but it won't hurt anything ,right? Is that what we have all come up with? Thanks for the great and fun
discussion from all.
ps. don't borrow from 50's engineering
05-04-2010, 05:22 PM
#25
mad skill collector
Squid
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Hayward, San Francisco bay area: California
Posts: 77
Holy F@#$ !! I just did my dynojet stage 1 jet kit. Let me tell you
I love it.... still have to fine tune but what a difference in rideability
I gotta go ride.... check ya latter
I love it.... still have to fine tune but what a difference in rideability
I gotta go ride.... check ya latter
05-09-2010, 08:51 PM
#26
Member
Squid
Squid
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Bremerton WA
Posts: 78
heater/cooler function
The lines may have another function and that is too provide additional cooling of the radiator fluid and increase the cooling capacity of the engine coolant system. The evaporation and atomization of the fuel in the carburator helps absorb quite a lot of heat to help cool the bike when it is hot.
My bike has not had the cooling lines on it since I bought it. I did not know they were supposed to be on the bike until I looked at my spare set of carbs. I have ridden it at 35 degrees out for long periods and when it was 104 degrees outside, and have had no adverse effects in either situation.
I had a Kawasaki 454 LTD in the 80's with Kehin carbs that sure could of used the carb warmers. They used to ice up when it was below 40 and would limit the top speed of the bike to about 70 mph, with lots of backfiring. I would have to pull over and let them self thaw for a few minutes. When it was below 32 you couldn't ride without the choke part way on. Below 29 needed full choke just to run. Yes, it was my only transportation for a year.
Nothing worse than scraping frost off your seat, when you were wearing only jeans, shoes, and a lined jean jacket and had a 7 mile ride home.
The hawk definitely doesn't need them but I have not tried it when it was below 32 yet.
My bike has not had the cooling lines on it since I bought it. I did not know they were supposed to be on the bike until I looked at my spare set of carbs. I have ridden it at 35 degrees out for long periods and when it was 104 degrees outside, and have had no adverse effects in either situation.
I had a Kawasaki 454 LTD in the 80's with Kehin carbs that sure could of used the carb warmers. They used to ice up when it was below 40 and would limit the top speed of the bike to about 70 mph, with lots of backfiring. I would have to pull over and let them self thaw for a few minutes. When it was below 32 you couldn't ride without the choke part way on. Below 29 needed full choke just to run. Yes, it was my only transportation for a year.
Nothing worse than scraping frost off your seat, when you were wearing only jeans, shoes, and a lined jean jacket and had a 7 mile ride home.
The hawk definitely doesn't need them but I have not tried it when it was below 32 yet.
05-09-2010, 10:57 PM
#27
Senior Member
MotoGP
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: NYC
Posts: 5,033
Wow, always tons of discussion with these coolant lines. Since you got a lot of "I dont knows" with long stories of old cars, I can give you at least one other side. I blocked my carb coolant lines 6 years ago and ride year round on city & highway in temps as low as single digits and as high as triple digits. In my opinion there is no ill effect. All possible weather combos like 60* rain into mid 20's in the same 24 hour period with no issues. So there is your field test. No coolant going to the carbs day in & day out. bike runs fine. I guess I am missing out on the cooling effect of carbs (ha) but hope the two big radiators do the job.
05-10-2010, 04:55 AM
#28
Senior Member
SuperBike
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: thorold ontario
Posts: 1,978
that reminded me of the old vw bugs where the tire pressure from the spare powered the washer fluid
