SuperHawk Forum

SuperHawk Forum (https://www.superhawkforum.com/forums/)
-   Modifications - Performance (https://www.superhawkforum.com/forums/modifications-performance-29/)
-   -   Topless Airbox (https://www.superhawkforum.com/forums/modifications-performance-29/topless-airbox-23452/)

FL02SupaHawk996 08-11-2010 07:52 AM

Topless Airbox
 
I'm attempting to make this age old mod work, but I'll need help from you carb tuning gurus!

particulars:
STG1 motor
billet long velocity stacks
K&N filter
no snorkel or top on airbox
no plastic heat guard around the carbs
195 front main
200 rear main
55 Slow Jets
3rd position from top for needle clip
2.25 turns out on pilots

It cranks and idles nicely but there are issues with mixture up top...

I've put just over 100 miles the fresh STG1 motor and it makes good power down low, but after 5K RPMs it seems to ramp up more slowly and stumbles at 7K RPMs. This seems to be more pronounced when motor is warmed up.

I'm guessing the mixture is just too rich after 5K RPMs and suspect it may be caused by the weak springs on the slides or mains that are just too big or both...

Thanks in advance for your help!

hawxter996 08-11-2010 08:22 AM

have you dynoed?
what do plugs look like?

please dont guess,you have a lot to lose

FL02SupaHawk996 08-11-2010 08:27 AM


Originally Posted by hawxter996 (Post 277465)
have you dynoed?
what do plugs look like?

please dont guess,you have a lot to lose

I haven't pulled the plugs yet and I was hesitant to dyno it as is, but maybe I should just to get the air/fuel mixture graph?

RCVTR 08-11-2010 09:21 AM

Oh, I get it. You're joking, right?

FL02SupaHawk996 08-11-2010 09:23 AM


Originally Posted by RCVTR (Post 277479)
Oh, I get it. You're joking, right?

If I don't try it then I'll never know for sure it can't be done;)

mikstr 08-11-2010 10:12 AM

Why not ring up Roger D as he is the one who suggested it? One would imagine he can help guide you in this.....

FL02SupaHawk996 08-11-2010 10:16 AM


Originally Posted by mikstr (Post 277489)
Why not ring up Roger D as he is the one who suggested it? One would imagine he can help guide you in this.....

He gave me this starting point, so I don't think I'll bother him till I get between a rock and a hard place. I'm workin on a dyno run apptmt now cuz I want to see what the mixture is doin up top.

FL02SupaHawk996 08-11-2010 10:29 AM

Dyno date is set!

I'll change the oil again and do the dyno run as soon as the rain stops from TD#5 out in the Gulf of Mexico...

hawxter996 08-11-2010 12:14 PM

we will be waiting!

could you have a low pressure area under the tank at speed?

FL02SupaHawk996 08-11-2010 12:20 PM


Originally Posted by hawxter996 (Post 277507)
we will be waiting!

could you have a low pressure area under the tank at speed?

Anything is possible...I know I have a low pressure area between my ears:(

hawxter996 08-11-2010 12:23 PM


Originally Posted by FL02SupaHawk996 (Post 277508)
Anything is possible...I know I have a low pressure area between my ears:(



damn man you owe me a keyboard!

FL02SupaHawk996 08-11-2010 12:28 PM


Originally Posted by hawxter996 (Post 277509)
damn man you owe me a keyboard!

spilled a beer in mine and still it works...just smells funny:cool:

hawxter996 08-11-2010 12:32 PM

i was just wondering if at speed could a low pressure area form?
if so that could throw off the dyno reading,since it would be sitting still.

FL02SupaHawk996 08-11-2010 12:37 PM


Originally Posted by hawxter996 (Post 277514)
i was just wondering if at speed could a low pressure area form?
if so that could throw off the dyno reading,since it would be sitting still.

The two big fans pointed at each side of the bike should help, but we'll have to see...

wyldryce 08-11-2010 12:48 PM

At this point (though you know it already, and I admire your commitment to proving for SURE it won't work well) you are in shady territory. If *I* were in your shoes, and dealing with a hand-built performance motor that adds a ton of variables into the equation, I would be wanting to know FOR SURE what my a/f was doing at all times. You are going to hit the nail on the head a lot quicker if you know where you are aiming. To that end, I would install a bung into the exhaust (if it doesn't have one already) and run a wideband O2 sensor, preferably one with data-logging capability. Dyno time is great and all, but really isn't going to simulate real world riding; you're not going to be doing WFO runs in upper gears all the time. You need to know how it is responding in regular riding conditions. With a wideband and the appropriate gauge mounted in the cockpit where you can glance at it, or again, data-log, you will know pretty quickly with less jetting changes whether you can make the modded airbox work, and not endanger your motor in the process. It's worth it weight in gold when tuning a forced induction system, but pretty valuable in general.
They aren't stupid expensive anymore either.
-R

FL02SupaHawk996 08-11-2010 12:52 PM


Originally Posted by wyldryce (Post 277517)
At this point (though you know it already, and I admire your commitment to proving for SURE it won't work well) you are in shady territory. If *I* were in your shoes, and dealing with a hand-built performance motor that adds a ton of variables into the equation, I would be wanting to know FOR SURE what my a/f was doing at all times. You are going to hit the nail on the head a lot quicker if you know where you are aiming. To that end, I would install a bung into the exhaust (if it doesn't have one already) and run a wideband O2 sensor, preferably one with data-logging capability. Dyno time is great and all, but really isn't going to simulate real world riding; you're not going to be doing WFO runs in upper gears all the time. You need to know how it is responding in regular riding conditions. With a wideband and the appropriate gauge mounted in the cockpit where you can glance at it, or again, data-log, you will know pretty quickly with less jetting changes whether you can make the modded airbox work, and not endanger your motor in the process. It's worth it weight in gold when tuning a forced induction system, but pretty valuable in general.
They aren't stupid expensive anymore either.
-R

Thanks Ross that's good info cuz I haven't even considered data logging yet...

wyldryce 08-11-2010 12:55 PM

This is the system I have experience with:
http://www.innovatemotorsports.com/x...cat=262&page=1
-R

mikstr 08-11-2010 01:06 PM


Originally Posted by wyldryce (Post 277517)
Dyno time is great and all, but really isn't going to simulate real world riding; you're not going to be doing WFO runs in upper gears all the time.
-R


Speak for yourself...... lol :)

8541Hawk 08-11-2010 01:09 PM


Originally Posted by mikstr (Post 277532)
Speak for yourself...... lol :)

Glad I'm not the only one......... ;)

wyldryce 08-11-2010 01:13 PM


Originally Posted by 8541Hawk (Post 277536)
Glad I'm not the only one......... ;)

Weren't you, just yesterday, espousing the virtues of a usable first gear? ;)

8541Hawk 08-11-2010 01:27 PM


Originally Posted by wyldryce (Post 277540)
Weren't you, just yesterday, espousing the virtues of a usable first gear? ;)

Why yes I was, not sure what your point is. Just because you open it up in the higher gears doesn't mean you don't use the lower ones in the real tight stuff. ;)

wyldryce 08-11-2010 01:38 PM

Yeah, but not WFO in 1st, unless you like sitting on your head. ;)
Again, since you seemed to miss MY point, most people don't ride around WFO. So, actually TUNING a bike rather than tuning for WFO on a dyno might be helpful, especially for somebody trying to run a modified airbox, which so far in SH history, hasn't been proven to work so well. Just trying to be helpful. :)

-R

Tweety 08-11-2010 01:41 PM


Originally Posted by wyldryce (Post 277546)
Yeah, but not WFO in 1st, unless you like sitting on your head. ;)
Again, since you seemed to miss MY point, most people don't ride around WFO. So, actually TUNING a bike rather than tuning for WFO on a dyno might be helpful, especially for somebody trying to run a modified airbox, which so far in SH history, hasn't been proven to work so well. Just trying to be helpful. :)

-R

Well... I'd like mine running right all the way, but that's just me...;)

'sides anything with big jugs that are topless is a good idea if you ask me...

8541Hawk 08-11-2010 01:45 PM


Originally Posted by wyldryce (Post 277546)
Yeah, but not WFO in 1st, unless you like sitting on your head. ;)
Again, since you seemed to miss MY point, most people don't ride around WFO. So, actually TUNING a bike rather than tuning for WFO on a dyno might be helpful, especially for somebody trying to run a modified airbox, which so far in SH history, hasn't been proven to work so well. Just trying to be helpful. :)

-R

Well it was a bit of humor is response to this quote:


Originally Posted by wyldryce (Post 277517)
you're not going to be doing WFO runs in upper gears all the time.

You didn't say anything about 1st gear until later..... I know you're still a bit miffed about the carb heat discussion (or you would be giving mikstr a hard time also, as i just agreed to his comment) but come on, you are really trying to split hairs here.

wyldryce 08-11-2010 01:57 PM


Originally Posted by Tweety (Post 277547)
Well... I'd like mine running right all the way, but that's just me...;)

'sides anything with big jugs that are topless is a good idea if you ask me...

Yeah, dyno time is useful too, I was just advocating for knowing what it was doing all the time ;)

wyldryce 08-11-2010 02:01 PM


Originally Posted by 8541Hawk (Post 277548)
Well it was a bit of humor is response to this quote:



You didn't say anything about 1st gear until later..... I know you're still a bit miffed about the carb heat discussion (or you would be giving mikstr a hard time also, as i just agreed to his comment) but come on, you are really trying to split hairs here.

It was actually initially directed at your response to his response, hence to both of you, but I forgot this forum doesn't include a quote inside of a quote ;)

I'm over the carb heat thing, but you're right, I've got a pretty hairy head, so there's always plenty of hairs to split. :)

Tweety 08-11-2010 02:11 PM


Originally Posted by wyldryce (Post 277550)
Yeah, dyno time is useful too, I was just advocating for knowing what it was doing all the time ;)

No problem, I know what you meant, and I agree to a point... But you can tune for a lot more than WFO on a dyno if you know what you are doing... Altought the typical dyno operator is used to tuning IL4's at WFO, so you get what you pay for (at least sometimes)...

Besides a wideband is usefull... I have one... But I also have a dyno... ;)

wyldryce 08-11-2010 04:34 PM


Originally Posted by Tweety (Post 277557)
No problem, I know what you meant, and I agree to a point... But you can tune for a lot more than WFO on a dyno if you know what you are doing... Altought the typical dyno operator is used to tuning IL4's at WFO, so you get what you pay for (at least sometimes)...

Besides a wideband is usefull... I have one... But I also have a dyno... ;)

you have ALL the cool toys :fawkdance::fawkdance::fawkdance:

FL02SupaHawk996 09-29-2010 07:54 AM

Update
 
While waiting to get a dyno run I leaned up the mains:

running airbox lid & snorkel
190 front main
195 rear main
55 Slow Jets
3rd position from top for needle clip
2.25 turns out on pilots

Results are much better power w/o hesitation all the way to redline, but if WOT then I get a stutter around 7-8K RPM, so next mains going in will be 185&190 before the dyno run so she will make max hp&torque for the dyno run:cool:

nothing 09-29-2010 09:00 AM

so would you want to sell those 200/195 mains? :) or if you have another 190...:rolleyes:


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:22 AM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands