SuperHawk Forum

SuperHawk Forum (https://www.superhawkforum.com/forums/)
-   Modifications - Performance (https://www.superhawkforum.com/forums/modifications-performance-29/)
-   -   BMC race vs BMC street vs DNA vs K&N (https://www.superhawkforum.com/forums/modifications-performance-29/bmc-race-vs-bmc-street-vs-dna-vs-k-n-10176/)

Speed_Demon 12-21-2006 01:39 PM

BMC race vs BMC street vs DNA vs K&N
 
I've heard mixed feelings on these filters. Obviously I want the highest flow possible. What is the best choice for my SH with stage one jetting and after market exhaust?

Scooberhawk 12-22-2006 09:14 AM

What type of jet kit? I believe it is tough to get one of those kits running well with a high-flow filter.

Also, are you running a full exhaust or slipons? The resulting top-end will be negligible with anything but a full exhaust.

Plus, high flow filters essentially move the power up in the powerband, so you'll lose a smidgen of the SHawk's bottom-end power. So it may not be worthwhile if you don't keep the bike revved high.

EngineNoO9 12-22-2006 09:37 AM

whichever filter you get the jetting has to be changed and likely the needle position as well. I have the k&N and it took awhile to get right and I eventually took it to a shop to get running well. if you get a BMC go for the BMC race... just my $.02

Texassuperhawk 12-22-2006 10:16 AM

I had a k and n and Jardine High mount race baffles, I have a combo of a Factory jet kit and a Dyno Jet kit in mine. Ran like a top. Kindof pricey though having 2 jet kits to buy.

Speed_Demon 12-22-2006 11:47 AM


Originally Posted by Texassuperhawk (Post 37723)
I had a k and n and Jardine High mount race baffles, I have a combo of a Factory jet kit and a Dyno Jet kit in mine. Ran like a top. Kindof pricey though having 2 jet kits to buy.

Right now I'm running a Dynojet stage one kit (#1185) with the needle in the sixth slot and 190/195 mains. What parts of the two different kits did you utilize?

caffeine-racer 12-22-2006 06:33 PM

Here's something I read recently about Air Filters
 
from the RC-51 list , interesting.

http://www.rc51.org/airfilt.htm

Speed_Demon 12-22-2006 07:17 PM

Yeah I read that same article. On most bikes with a tuned airbox the stock filters seem create more power. I'd love to save the $100 and use my stocker but its dirty and I don't want to pay $70 for a stock non-reusable air filter.

The Hawk Guy 12-23-2006 01:40 AM


Originally Posted by caffeine-racer (Post 37749)
from the RC-51 list , interesting.

http://www.rc51.org/airfilt.htm


Very interesting article.....Thanks a lot!!

Hawkrider 12-23-2006 05:31 PM

I think it varies from bike to bike. On the 1000RR they claim that the BMC makes more power and the K&N you can actually lose power. I don't think that comparison takes tuning into account though. I have a K&N on my bike and it runs just fine with the Factory kit.

EngineNoO9 12-23-2006 10:40 PM


Originally Posted by caffeine-racer (Post 37749)
from the RC-51 list , interesting.

http://www.rc51.org/airfilt.htm


I've read that but remember we do have a different motor/airbox and fuel system then the rc51. Plus personally I've noticed a difference between stock and the k&N. And that was after jet kit for the exhaust and stock filter then switching to k&N and exhaust

Thumper 12-23-2006 10:47 PM

K&N, Factory Pro Kit, 48 Pilots, 4 degree advancer, Runs like a great.

Jake D 12-26-2006 11:16 AM

My bike mechanic is very, very competent, an endurance racer, and a former Super Hawk owner. When I got my Jardine high mounts, I discussed a re-jet with him. He adviced me "to never, under any circumstances, put anything but a stock air filter in a Super Hawk." I didn't even bother to ask why. That was enough for me.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:22 PM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands