SuperHawk Forum

SuperHawk Forum (https://www.superhawkforum.com/forums/)
-   Modifications - Performance (https://www.superhawkforum.com/forums/modifications-performance-29/)
-   -   190x55 Q2 on standard rim... (https://www.superhawkforum.com/forums/modifications-performance-29/190x55-q2-standard-rim-28606/)

nath981 Jun 19, 2012 12:27 PM

190x55 Q2 on standard rim...
 
6 Attachment(s)
4,033 odo. miles, likely closer to 3,500 miles corrected for gearing and taller tire.

cold pressures: 28R; 31F.

wear characteristics and performance: best tire I've had on so far no doubt (35,000miles).

MY TWO TIREMEN ADAMANTLY DENY ONE MORE 200 MILE RUN!!!

Attachment 24533

LEFT SIDE BALD.

Attachment 24534

RIGHT SIDE ALMOST BALD.

Attachment 24535

VERY LITTLE FLAT CENTER WEAR; BARELY PERCEPTIBLE.

Attachment 24536

SEE GHOST STRIP OF REINFORCED CENTER SECTION/BAND THAT PREVENTS HIGH SPIN GROWTH.

Attachment 24537

THESE AWESOME TIRES DESERVE ANOTHER SET.

Attachment 24538

aja Jun 19, 2012 12:36 PM

You still have another 3500 miles left on the edges lol

How was the clearance in the chain guard and swing arm? I've been running 180 because it doesn't look like a 190 will fit

blamecanada Jun 19, 2012 01:27 PM

ahhh Q2s, my favorite tire also...what made you get the 190x55? they do make them in 180

thetophatflash Jun 19, 2012 02:28 PM

I don't know about the tire, but if you tire of those two pesky dogs they would make great siblings for my two Goldens. lol

Tweety Jun 19, 2012 02:48 PM

That wer pattern is something to be proud of... ;) It takes work...

VTRsurfer: Agreed on the pit crew!

wsharpman Jun 19, 2012 05:43 PM

uhmm 35000? I only could get 2500- 2800 out of the 2 sets of q2's I ran of course they were 180's but still? sure you didnt add a zero lol
great wear on those tires though nice and even all around :P

RobtheDrummer Jun 19, 2012 06:47 PM

You should see the roads we ride on. ;) However my wear pattern is nothing like Nate's.

nath981 Jun 19, 2012 08:49 PM

1 Attachment(s)
this is what happens when you overheat the front tire.

Attachment 24532

nath981 Jun 19, 2012 09:36 PM


Originally Posted by aja (Post 336041)
You still have another 3500 miles left on the edges lol

you're right, but if i were track riding, I'd have another 3500 left on the middle.

How was the clearance in the chain guard and swing arm? I've been running 180 because it doesn't look like a 190 will fit

don't run a chain guard but the swingarm is no problem. If i had to, i'd mod the chain guard.


Originally Posted by blamecanada (Post 336042)
ahhh Q2s, my favorite tire also...what made you get the 190x55? they do make them in 180

I ran a bto16 190x50 and then a 190x55 power pure and both were too steep at the sides for a 5.5" rim. i was set to order a 180 when i mounted a 190 Q2 on a friend's bike. As soon as i saw the arc/profile, i knew it was what i wanted. Look on Dunlop's site for DP211 fitment(same shape as the Q2) and they recommend the 190x55 for a 5.5in rim for the track. Well as it turns out, it's perfect for the street because it gives you a little more contact patch whereas with the 180, i was at the ends of the tire. The other benefit is taller tire = less rotations, hence better center mileage. In fact, Dunlop makes a 190x60 DP211 which would be even better, but no dice for the Q2 because i would have tried one.


Originally Posted by thetophatflash (Post 336049)
I don't know about the tire, but if you tire of those two pesky dogs they would make great siblings for my two Goldens. lol

NFW, that's "no fuckin way" in case you're wondering......would be hard pressed to part with my tiremen.


Originally Posted by VTRsurfer (Post 336050)
Way to go with the even wear nath! That's about as even as I've ever see

I like your pit crew too.;) And they're better looking than you.

yeah, you're right and I'm glad you think so, because i don't want you to find me attractive.

and yeah, best tire wear i've ever experienced in terms of even and balanced.


Originally Posted by wsharpman (Post 336070)
uhmm 35000? I only could get 2500- 2800 out of the 2 sets of q2's I ran of course they were 180's but still? sure you didnt add a zero lol
great wear on those tires though nice and even all around :P

That mileage along with flat centers is most common, but the combination of a taller tire and the fact that I nullify all engine braking contributes to longer center wear. Also, go out of my way to avoid straight roads. Ask Rob.

nath981 Jun 20, 2012 08:02 PM


Originally Posted by Tweety (Post 336051)
That wer pattern is something to be proud of... ;) It takes work...

Best one i've had........ thinking that someone might comment on the left being bald while the right has a little more tread left, but most probably don't know why. At first, i was wondering myself, then I figured it out.

For euros who drive on the opposite side of the road, it should be opposite mine.

nath981 Jun 20, 2012 08:13 PM


Originally Posted by wsharpman (Post 336070)
uhmm 35000? I only could get 2500- 2800 out of the 2 sets of q2's I ran of course they were 180's but still? sure you didnt add a zero lol
great wear on those tires though nice and even all around :P

just got your ref to 35,000..............No. didn't add a zero, that's how many miles i have on the hawk

nath981 Jun 22, 2012 04:50 PM

7 Attachment(s)

Originally Posted by aja (Post 336041)
How was the clearance in the chain guard and swing arm? I've been running 180 because it doesn't look like a 190 will fit

plenty of clearance even for a 190x60 dp211 if you need for track days. Here's mine with 102 chain links, 15/44 sprockets.

I wanted to try the 190/60, but they don't make it in a Q2 yet.

As you can see below, i jammed mine up as close as possible by cutting the chain shorter. There is about 1/2" clearance, so no problemos.

Attachment 24509

Attachment 24510

Attachment 24511

Attachment 24512

Attachment 24513

Attachment 24514

Attachment 24515

nath981 Oct 27, 2012 04:58 PM

1 Attachment(s)
I don't know if anyone has tried the 190x55 Q2, but this is the end of my second pair and i still love this set up. Mileage is same as previous @ 3500 mi with odo correction.

For those who spend most of their time on curvy roads, this is the tire IMO. The slightly taller 190x55 gives you a few more miles in terms of center wear by virtue of fewer rotations and the added height seems to facilitate turn in, and/or at least help to nullify some of the slower turn in typical of larger tires. Despite wear to the threads, there is no flat spot in the middle. Handling is awesome, predictable and the larger contact patch of the wider tire allows full lean w/o the need to go to the edges as with a 180.

Just got a new set yesterday..... $274 including fed ex 2 day delivery from STG.

http://i608.photobucket.com/albums/t...andkids102.jpg

Attachment 24180

xeris Nov 22, 2012 07:21 AM

Following this thread with interest.
I have a question regarding the dimensions in your tag line. You have the ride height increase due to the tire alone as 12mm. Using this formula 190X.55=104.5-(180X.55)=5.5mm ride height increase. I can't come up with 12mm ride height increase that you attribute to the tire.
Is the 12mm actual physical measurments of the tire mounted as compared to the stock tire? Help me understand this. I realize the the formula I used is only approximate and tires will vary a bit between brands and different models within brands.

nath981 Nov 22, 2012 06:39 PM


Originally Posted by xeris (Post 345306)
Following this thread with interest.
I have a question regarding the dimensions in your tag line. You have the ride height increase due to the tire alone as 12mm. Using this formula 190X.55=104.5-(180X.55)=5.5mm ride height increase. I can't come up with 12mm ride height increase that you attribute to the tire.
Is the 12mm actual physical measurments of the tire mounted as compared to the stock tire? Help me understand this. I realize the the formula I used is only approximate and tires will vary a bit between brands and different models within brands.

you mean people actaully read these things? haha

yeah, I messed up that measurement. I think I guestimated a half inch visually and the must have neglected to cut that in half. Dumbass. Accord to Dunlop's specs below, the 190x55 is 9mm larger dia than the 180, so that would be 4.5mm taller actual, right?

Thanks for the pointing that out. Another thing that probably has to be factored in though in terms of height is the 102 link chain that moves the axle forward to the max. This obviously shortens the wheelbase(awesome in itself), but most likely also affects height as it moves the wheel foward and up simultaneously. What this translates to in height mms would require some measurements i haven't taken yet.

Note also in the dunlop link that the 190X55 Q2 specifies a 5.5 as recommended rim size and this is a no-brainer once you try it. This is not the case for the 190 BTO16 and the 190 power pure both of which i've tried with negative results as the arc is too steep at the edges making them frightening at extreme lean angle as compared with the gentle arc of the Q2s. They are perfect and this was recently confirmed by SR's 9+ test ratings, and they didn't even use the the Q2s on the recommended wheel size. I did one 180 Q2 and it was good for sure, but doesn't compare to the 190.

One thing for sure, JDs shock mod, the jacked up rear, shortened wheelbase, the 520 conversion, the larger Q2 and the recent weight reduction of pipes has brought this bike to a whole new level handling-wise. These mods in combination have transformed the SH significantly in terms of lithe and agility.

High-Performance Dunlop Motorcycle Tires

xeris Nov 23, 2012 06:01 AM

I wonder if a link can be removed with a 530 chain, 180 tire and stock gearing without clearance issues?

nath981 Nov 23, 2012 06:29 AM


Originally Posted by xeris (Post 345325)
I'm guessing that removing, (is it one link?) with the 190 tire only works with a 520 chain. Can a link be removed with a 530 chain and 180 tire without clearance issues?

has nothin to do with 520, but with sprocket sizes. You can move the wheel full forward, 180 or 190 don't matter, wrap the chain around the rear sprocket and see what you can remove. you can cut with a dremel or grinder and then you need a rivet tool to reassemble unless you use a clip type master link.

I don't know what kind of riding you do, but I'm kind of fanatical about how my bike turns or handles on the twisty roads i ride. If you're not a carver, don't bother with these tweaks because it's likely you won't even notice.

xeris Nov 23, 2012 06:58 AM

Thanks for the reply. I realized after I posted the question that it was naive and edited the question, but not before you answered.
At my skill level I might not notice, but that's not going to stop me from thinking I need more mods.

nath981 Nov 23, 2012 11:53 AM


Originally Posted by xeris (Post 345328)
Thanks for the reply. I realized after I posted the question that it was naive and edited the question, but not before you answered.
At my skill level I might not notice, but that's not going to stop me from thinking I need more mods.

no, that's not goin to stop you from thinking you need more mods. It's only discipline and self control that will enable you to put the horse before the cart.

assuming that everything is safe in terms of the bike, the first priority should be to mod the rider..........as you improve with time, education and practice, you will discover the where, what, why and how the bike set up is limiting your ability to ride it well. At this point it's time to address those weak points and test them to verify the fix, and then move to the next one.

This doesn't seem to be the modus operandi for most however, instead they think that modding the shit out of their bikes in itself make them heroes and reduces the need for honing riding skills. The rider is the most significant component in the equation and this has been proven countless times.

don't worry about being a dumbass with me, because like I always say, we're all dumbasses, it's just that some of us don't realize it. ha

We're all learning all the time or at least should be.

xeris Nov 24, 2012 07:00 AM

Members like you and others on this forum have been invaluable resource to increase my knowledge of the SH in particular, motorcycles in general and improve my riding skills. The questions centered around this thread are a way for me to increase my knowledge of suspension tuning.
I am at a point with my riding that the deficiencies in the suspension are becoming annoyingly apparent. This type of discourse will help me do the right set up when the time comes.
Thanks again.

nath981 Nov 24, 2012 08:54 AM

There are many threads on here/google that detail the basics of sag,etc., and this should be a starting point after you match front springs and rear shock to your weight.

we can go way off topic here, but understand for sure that tires and tire pressure are critical elements to tuning your suspension. Pick your favorite road and experiment with 36f/42rpsi cold and next try 28/30psi cold and you'll find out for yourself exactly what role tires/pressure play in suspension.

Extreme differences in suspension settings highlight their effects and this helps the rider to understand what each is doing and certainly this modus operandi is not specific to suspension or even to motorcycles, but most everything you endeavor to understand. Zen and the Art of................

Anyway, do the same with rebound, compression, preload settings to enlighten yourself relative to their respective effects. This is my way because I tend to get lost in all the abstract bullshit. I call it learning the real way.

The basic message here is don't believe me or any other fool w/o first proving it to yourself , that is, unless you want to be bovine.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:23 AM.


© 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands