SuperHawk Forum

SuperHawk Forum (https://www.superhawkforum.com/forums/)
-   General Discussion (https://www.superhawkforum.com/forums/general-discussion-30/)
-   -   VFR400 conversion? (https://www.superhawkforum.com/forums/general-discussion-30/vfr400-conversion-19250/)

willz 06-22-2009 10:35 AM

VFR400 conversion?
 
So I was cruisin around craigslist today and saw this ad.

http://baltimore.craigslist.org/mcy/1232481172.html

At the bottom the guy says that a superhawk motor (typo in the years though) will fit into the VFR400 chasis. Has anyone ever done this or heard of this being done or know if its really possible? If you have some pics of said project please post 'em!

Tweety 06-22-2009 10:45 AM

I doubt it's a direct bolt-on... But If you are crazy enough most things fit...;)

Don't ask me how I know...:rolleyes:

JOHNNYP 06-22-2009 11:18 AM

I saw that this morning.....I can't believe it's a bolt in proposition! They are really cool bikes though.

Tweety 06-22-2009 11:41 AM


Honda Super Hawk 996 cc motors 1990 thru 04 bolt into this frame. The benefit in handling suspension, braking is well worth the effort. These aluminum single sided swing arm frames are mono shock set ups, superior in strength and weight, the frame and the running gear are far superior to yours.
Well, the vtr already has a mono shock and I kind of doubt the older frame for a weaker engine is stronger... Lighter is a possibility... But I doubt it...

The "running gear" is in most parts the same as the VTR... so I'm not so sure it's an upgrade on the VTR... It's an upgrade on the viffer engine in that frame though... That's sure going to be one wild little beast...

kai ju 06-22-2009 12:03 PM

I wonder if he meant Hawk GT, especially since the Superhawk doesn't date back to 1990.
Kai Ju

Tweety 06-22-2009 01:42 PM

Well that was made earlier than 90 i belive? And it's certainly isn't a 996... Plus it's already a single swingarm with a mono shock... So that doesn't make sence either...

Not that the add made any sence what so ever...;)

gozuki 06-22-2009 04:33 PM

The NT650 was a vtwin, sssa, available in 87 earliest. Frame flexed quite a bit though.

little squirt 06-22-2009 07:12 PM


Originally Posted by gozuki (Post 223556)
Frame flexed quite a bit though.


All the years motorcycling, this kinda quote to this day always makes me crack up.....:rolleyes:

motokraft 06-23-2009 01:11 PM

gents doubt it very much the 400 is a tiny bike (great bike !!) the 400 mtor is a very tight squeeze into this bike . i cant say for sure it cant be done (there have been interceptor 750 motors in ) but i think the superhawk motor is way too tall , i can check it out more as i have a friend driving a vfr 400 i might bsee shortly .
if a longer front end had too go in im sure this would wreck the geometry ....

mikstr 06-23-2009 01:15 PM

may fit if you can find the right flux capacitor.....

motokraft 06-23-2009 01:40 PM


Originally Posted by little squirt (Post 223584)
All the years motorcycling, this kinda quote to this day always makes me crack up.....:rolleyes:



them little hawks will out handle a lot of bikes :D great chassis imo :cool:


just needs better forks/brakes ;)

motojoe 06-26-2009 04:32 PM

It looks like an RC30.

MLB 06-28-2009 07:59 PM


Originally Posted by gozuki (Post 223556)
The NT650 was a vtwin, sssa, available in 87 earliest. Frame flexed quite a bit though.

89-91 actually.
Frame did not flex.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:49 PM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands